All day today.

Its just another day same as the days ahead but hey let smile away the day!

Its simple, just move the face muscles up.

/Robert Johansson

RBIm as a technology is to link your attention and somatic reference to create, Intention.
That is for some people like, what the fuck is that useful for?

Our brain organize to context, so, if we have one we don’t like for some reason or we want some other one, we use willpower to get another one that works, for a short time duration.
We can be motivated for change, we can have willpower, but that don’t help us.
Now, RBIm uses the idea of iconic representation is a combination of keeping the comparison mode constant, with the intended experience you want to have, peace, harmony, flow, happiness, enjoyment, energy, efficient, excellence, perfect, etc..as the list goes on…we move on…

Think about when something was beautiful for you, it could been the child being born, the sunset, the boat on still water, a walk on beach, the first kiss, now, as you think about that, you will produce some of that experience, but it won’t be enough to go back there into the experience, that is when you need intention, if you have that, you be holding your attention the same meaning, you be entering the experience, if you wait using faith to get there.
Some people accuse me of overgeneralization, meaning, I state something to simple, as if it is so simple, then everyone would do it and think it, what they do is to use their comparison mode, and willpower, to justify their own view without intention that works fine for the world at large, but if you use Intention, then that world shifts. It’s like this, I understand.

If you got your legs on each side of the crack, and as the crack widens, something gotta give.

Some people become in such panic they fail to do anything, they are debating which side is better without realizing they are soon going down.
It’s a simple description or analogy of the comparison mode and their correlation to representation channels and decision strategy.
As we debate, we fail to realize which is one key element of the RBIm technology it is a self realization model, it has a set structure that allows someone to get there on their own, in their own time.

Realizing.

Intention allows us to shift contextual reference, or as Joe would say, hold our attention elsewhere for another experience. As he got asked about that he said, well I done this workshop already as I am doing it with you now answer your question, as I do that for me this workshop is already done, and as I was planning it back then for me it was still done the same way I am now having done it, but for people who when you say that don’t make sense as you can do something you haven’t done yet.

If I do a workshop, it’s already done for me before I done it, then I also have set the experience for it.
Now, time is a context but time isn’t linear, its multitasking as it exists in our own minds, but time is linear for the external world which means a lot of people use external world time as their own internal time which obviously when exposed to Joe, and his particular time and experience will be somewhat different experience.

For someone using linear time, the workshop haven’t happen yet.
As they are going there to learn whatever they want to learn.

Before you are going to do something today or tomorrow, think about it, well if I did this day already, and decided what the experience would be having the day as for example a perfect day, that’s end your mind in a different time context, before your even have had your day, your brain starts to fill into the details and then the day becomes, well simple.

As I work with dyslexic kids, I ask them about how it is like already being able to read and spell first, as I elicit their future experience being able to do what they now can’t do, I send a message o their brains, hey there is where we going, I send and start up their Intention.
Naturally they don’t believe me, they have an attitude they don’t like reading, they hate teachers, they hate books, and as I prove to them they now can make sense of the letters, the words, their world is shifting, their attention suddenly goes into another gear, hey maybe I can make this work and as they get that message, the rest is easy.

Now, the same goes for resource management in business, in the ceo, the board of directors and the staff, all have a particular set linear time, and I come to them and teach them about another set time and experience which leads to more fun and success.

I guess that is fun.

/Robert Johansson
Time traveler practical applications

Paranoia is one of those things we like to think about as it is a way people do things.
If we keep the comparison mode in our mind here as we dig into this subject, shall we?

Paranoia is like this, it is taking the outside external context, internalize it, and then use criteria of proof from the outside world also, meaning how people behave, is then seen in a particular way, no matter the behavior, washing clothes becomes a way to poison them trough cloths, making dinner becomes suspicious due to why you’re doing that for me, and so on.

So, your behavior doesn’t matter what it is, will be seen as suspicious.
Then the paranoid will seek proof from others that they are right, including their particular way of seeing the world, and then the stone is on a roll.

Our brain organize to context, however we seldom think about how we have organized already and how we judge our organization.

We need stability, which means we will link and associate to a stability, this means, if our brain have sever instability, meaning it has several contextual shifts without any what people would call safe and controlled environment, things can happen fast.

Paranoia also includes control, which means the need for control become obsessive, and a lot of men who are divorced are feeling they are losing control and lack being grounded so they lose integrity and the solution they use is to kill their wife or girlfriend. That re-establish their safeline and baseline, and they think that is normal.

Paranoia happens when the comparison mode is done and life is lived trough representation channels, as everyone I been in contact with regarding paranoia, all show the same display of behaviors, they rationalize their own behavior being right and correct, if anyone have a different opinion they either lash out or they seek to poison others minds to see the world the same as them.

Bo Sjoberg who runs the NLP institute in Sweden display such signs of paranoia, the same goes for others and it doesn’t help when people as that use NLP tools to persuade as that really can be a crackpot.

Signs to be aware off,

1. Control need.
2. View the world from the outside decide criteria meaning what people do show them their world view is correct but obviously flawed.
3. A need for people to see the world as they do.
4. Unbalanced behavior often mood shifts for no reason.

Now talking to such people we can establish a common ground, agreeing to their world view to create rapport and guide them from that particular view as it is limiting and also keep in mind, their comparison mode isn’t working properly as it is self fulfilling meaning, new input if it doesn’t fit their view, doesn’t exist for them. That is one key of communication, that what you send out is received, often its deleted or distorted and its better it’s deleted than distorted.

Entering the world of another individual that is off track isn’t an easy skill to have as it requires a lot more of the coach or therapist than what I seen people been able to do over the years with people I met.

Now, some might ask, why is Robert writing about paranoia?
No particular reason…

Don’t let your mind find reasons that isn’t there.

/Robert Johansson

Using RBIm as any technology is going to differ since we can’t expect people for example in a business setting to be doing dancing or such moves.

As we organize to context we can achieve the same using a different approach as if we elicit and establish the future experience for a business it accomplish the same result in the end.

Let say a software company have people doing coding, one use 10 hours for writing and checking, a few use 20 hours, and most use 25 hours and then another few use 35 hours.

Now, we would like to increase the efficiency of those writing and decoding software, in a ideal settings, 10 hours but if we can get everyone to 15 hours at average, then we be increasing the output of the company with weeks in advance.

Since the future context and experience seldom is the basis of a decision, just think about the upcoming week, how many of you are actually planning this week from next Monday or Sunday or such with a specific set experience for this week?

It’s a new way of thinking about experience, instead of being the victim of what is going on the outside, you can generate this experience from your own internal subjective reality within the contextual parameters so it is the experience you want to have this week, in spite of what is going on.

Now, that is the major difference with this technology, we shift the basis of your decision making to be fully future oriented, and then decide and choose the experience you want to have.

So, we ask the software coders, hey guys, and we look at the 10 hour guys, the 15 hours, and we ask them questions about how they do things based upon how they experience their work. Then we go and ask the guys that spend 35 hours and we get a contrast between those two.
What will be the major difference is, the guys using 10 hours will be future oriented and the guys using 35 hours won’t be.

The 10 hour guys also will use a much more streamlined strategy than the others.
One thing we do, is to spend a lot of time on details, which cost time without any benefit, to know what to spend time on what is important, what to make a priority, save time.

Now, using only the small amount above we can increase a company’s efficiency and output of productivity so it saves maybe let say 3 manpower and that is like a million a year.
So, I charge them half that or even the full amount of that, as they will save millions down the line.

Now doing the above I don’t need people to move their hands, to focus their attention, I just need to use the structural integrity of contextual organization people already use and that if we look at people already efficient and proficient in their field, they be future oriented, they be able to spend time on what is important in their field.

If you use those points to map the format in your company, suddenly you become aware of the lack of efficiency in your company and you get a lot of precise way to measure what is going on without any so called tools people nowadays use in the business settings that is more for show than dough.

I am effective, I spend little time with a client, I spend little time with any student as I expect them to be able to do things on their own, to practice and use what I teach based upon the above examples.

Now, human beings however always like to add complexity to things as it can’t be that easy, beliefs pops up based upon social and cultural references and experiences.
The reason we add complexity is that the brain is trying to FILL In the rest of the structure without having a plan which makes things well complicated, as I explain to someone what to do, they will try to do it differently, as they might not understand my instructions as I want them to or they think my instructions are flawed or wrong, so a ongoing calibration is needed.

The brain is adaptive, which makes it the reason why people just add complexity when it isn’t needed, it isn’t common that people hold their stuff the same, they like to add things.

Doing modeling for example this means one must hold stuff the same as what one wants is to find the structure for performance of excellence.
We can also model for efficiency. Etc…

So this is why communicating is tough with humans, the reception of our senses and our understanding is seldom based upon what is going on exactly what is sent from the sender but the intepretended message we receive.

Is that a word?

So, there are ways we make sure we can understand what someone is saying by trying to understand how their shoes fit, we excel our body language skills, we improve our receptiveness of our senses so we can more accurately understand what someone is actually saying using their assumptions they use in their sentences and words of meaning they convey to us.

So, what people say, isn’t what they mean.
What people mean they don’t say.

Now this goes for the so called guy that use so called precise fucking language of exquisite precision.

I don’t expect people to understand me, as I am often obviously astute to explain this particular concept of RBIm, repeatable and again the same way, and in different ways, so the posts here, even if different, use the same basis, future, experience, context, reality, etc..and all those things that makes up the RBIm technology is always expressed as obvious and clearly as possible and even so, people can’t get it due to words doesn’t show, experience, which when the video allows someone to, aha that is what he meant.

Then again we engage into the process to be able to do it and learning what to do in what sequence.

The sentence of, “you can be religious without even realizing it” shows how people receive information if the meaning in the communication isn’t sent within the same context, the listener must find a way to understand the message.

If you’re a software guy, go into a meeting asking if anyone seen Bill, and ask around and don’t explain who Bill is, until people go after or follow you what Bill, you say, Bill Gates, isn’t he here?
Isn’t he the most successful software dude around or what and what are we doing?

When you send a message of another context into another context that isn’t primed to the message you sent you activate curiosity.
Our brains needs to understand.

You can be highly successful without knowing it using RBIm technology.
/Robert Johansson
Magician, extraordinary wordsallad special dinner.

What would have happen if I made a different decision?

Regrets for example are things we remember due to us wanted to make another decision instead of the one we made.
It’s that simple.

We can always ask that we make a different priority, and that is our humanity, we make do what we got, as we seldom been educated and trained to ask, what is important here and for whom?

If we are in business, what is the wisest direction to go?
For amd, a company for cpu and gpu their decisions was to make a videocard that was small, efficient, low power and they bought up ati to make a fusion between cpu/gpu.
Nvidia choose a different route, they wanted to make fast, powerhungry and big die gpu, which in combination with the manufacturing process was a failure for them.

In the tech industry, they shrink the node to make a transistor, from current 40nm to 28nm, a nanometer is small, much smaller than a hair straw.
In each shrink, they enter issues with the productions, power leaks happens as the transistors become so small, they leak current between the walls.

So, the engineers come up with solutions and we are soon moving from silicon (sand) to metal.

Now, a company choose a direction, due to their life cycle is maybe 2 years, or even more as the next generation cpu and gpu is planned ahead with more than 3 years. Amd decided to use 32nm for their new gpu the 6000 series this upcoming October, however, 32nm was canceled and 28nm was the new target, but that process won’t be ready for another year, so amd scaled back the design to 40nm.

Other business have shorter cycles, a newspaper have its own cycle, one paper a day, meaning everything is organized differently there than a tech company.

It’s important when we think about regret what could have been that we also keep in mind we make decisions, and we sometimes make the wrong one even if it seems like the right one at the time.

Back in 1985 I choose to stay home and enter a 2 day class with education of become a trainer in karate, and at the time, I also had tickets to Bruce Springsteen who was making his, born in the USA tour.

Now, when I made the decision I thought I made the right one, but when I did enter the class I knew it was the wrong one as the class sucked ass.

My ticket was however given to someone that enjoy the concert, someone who wouldn’t have got there otherwise, as she was crying in a wagon of public transport, my friends saw that and offered her my tickets.

I go back and think about my life and think is there something else I regret?

Yes there is, but that one with the concert is the big one, as the result and effect of that decision was and become as it did, wasn’t in the line what I desired.

I make mistakes. Often a lot of them, and I move on and go on in spite of those, as I was taught NLP and used it, I also made effective work using NLP but I also saw the bad negative effects of using NLP as I was taught, one, it didn’t work for business, as I did that, I noted it sucked ass and I guess that is why bandlers business was a mess for years and still is.

So, I had to look elsewhere, I met people doing business, people they hire to fix their business, and I had to coach those guys as they couldn’t handle getting paid and become stressed out from that pressure of getting paid too much and then having to deliver the results.

I am not a business person I can do it as is it down with people running million dollar business and I hear them talk about what they do and I ask them, why do you do this this way and they can’t answer me and they are NLP trained by Bandler and they can’t do this in a way that actually works.

Its like, hey we got a customer here, that treats us badly, they are English based, which means they got the English culture with them, and then the flat ass Swedes trying to negotiate with them from fear of losing their customer….so I thought, gee, this is the guy that runs a million dollar business with bandler training behind him and he is running his business from fear of losing a customer?

Then I get shit from people that thinks they know what they are doing when they don’t and more they believe they know they do.

Back in the days of Russia, Stalin was a worse tyrant than the royals they killed and replaced, he made mass murder a hobby and then one scientist with an idea of how to make farming better got his ear, so he made the rest of the scientist who protested killed or moved to Gulag, which meant death by slow work. His ideas didn’t work, but he got the ear of Stalin who made the calls.

Critic, is a bad thing for many, I enjoy it, as it is no better way to find the truth and scrutiny its own life and business and such. NLP for example for me is a dubious technology due to how it is taught and used, and since I don’t agree on how it is taught and used, I make my voice heard out there and I am planning a post that will shake peoples convictions about NLP a lot.

I don’t expect people to be perfect, I know I am not, and I see how people aren’t that also, but then, what we do as human beings, is to go to this place where we enter something that is hard to explain, it’s like love, true love means, we do anything for someone else which often scruple free people use to steal and cheat and make bad things.

Let strive to become better, let make ourselves a little bit better each day, let our wisdom develop and let us find ways to share that so we can, make our environment a little bit friendlier than it can be.

How to do that without a hard look in the mirror is a denying the fact.

I live with my flaws, which means someone else doesn’t have to.

The notion people have about making others in their own image never seize to surprise me, why would we need more of you in this world?
Isn’t it enough with one of you?

Letting people be who they are, is what I am trying to convey and most have a hard time with that concept as it directly violate the human nature we want people to be like us, as if they aren’t, they then are different and that means, often bad.

I had 12 people, all being different than me, and they all wanted me to be like them and if I wasn’t, they become upset.

So, why is that why are people always trying to make other people to be like them instead of just accepting, they are different?

We make decisions, seldom do we think trough that that decision will lead to, as I make a decision nowadays for example if I buy a toy, I get something I will enjoy and have benefits from which doesn’t mean it will always be to my liking, as I buy things I expect them to met a specific criteria, and that don’t always happens, that the thing I get does what I intended it to do.

I bought a mouse pad yesterday, as I did I wanted to improve my pad and thought this might do it, I found however that the pad was too good, the mouse glided too much.
So, it didn’t meet my expectations, it still is a great mouse pad that someone else might enjoy or that I use it for another computer as I got two of them.

Sometimes we make a buy and we find out what we already have is perfect, so as I played yesterday I find out that my current pad, is perfect for me, so now I can enjoy the mouse movements even more when I realize that its perfect for me.

Now, some might go, hey isn’t that unconscious then that you didn’t know?

Let us enter the comparison mode, the age 4 development period.

As we do things and identify with context, we can do that and we can also, compare that with a similar experience which let us find out what it’s like being aware of identification.

What has happen with the concept of the unconscious was the unawareness of FREUD that Bandler and Grinder further used to persuade people to NOT question what they did and do.

They even teach like that, Grinder use the discovery pattern, do this drill and find out what he already knows which confused Robert Dilts who believed he found the model of the eye model, when in fact both grinder and bandler knew about it, they just wanted to see if Dilts would find it also. Now, think about it, bandler use hypnosis, unconscious when in fact it’s a myth.

When we don’t know, we use an analogy, to compare this with that, it’s that way we choose to explain things to people, make a comparison and why do we do that?

Let me use a story (analogy) as we organize information, we do so by context.

Now, there is two context, one is the outside one, the coffee you drink, but the taste of coffee, the pleasure of sitting there drinking it, has nothing to do with that environment or context, that is addition we do to the context of drinking coffee.

Wine taste like vinegar for me.

My tongue rolls upon itself.

Some say it’s the best thing since the invention of sex.

We can indulge into different contexts, as we do, we also seldom choose what to identify with, it becomes a random selection of trial and error. So, what we do here is to decide, this is my experience with this context, this I want to experience with my kids, with my spouse with my friends etc

So, I regret something as I recall the event, I today understand why I made that choice, and why I decided to do things as I did, as I expected things without checking the facts and the experience that would be there.

In many ways this regret also made me aware of what is important and why it’s important for me.

With this new technology, it’s become much easier to convey the message and concepts, even if it isn’t that simple to talk about spiritual or such matters without becoming a giant nerd of new age, there is also this practical thing we can learn to do, so it makes the environment of the outside become, the one we have on the inside in a way that we decided it to be like that.

To get there, we must do a triple bypass.

First we acknowledge that we identify the environment of context, the outside, and then understand we reflect this outside context on the inside in our own personal subjective way.

Then to understand and most importantly REALIZE that is how it works, allow you to understand, that you’re able to modify it at will and generate your own experience inside yourself that then, becomes the source to the outside, instead of the other way around.

You’re a product as far of what the outside world has imprinted upon you.

Happy with that?

If not, there is a choice and option to start generating the structural form, that allows you to become the master of your own destiny.

I guess that is appropriate for an alternate reality.

/Robert Johansson

It was an everyday morning, as he woke up he heard the radio play it’s the end of the world my RME.
Another day in paradise he said as he swung his legs to the bed side.

As we wake up we immediately go into where am I mode.
So memory serves us, we anchor us back into where we are and what we are suppose to do.
Its automatic and for some this is what they do every day going about it the same way every day.

Now, if we choose to do so, and intend things to be so, I guess that is fine as that would include a sense of purpose, some sense of meaning that what I do here is meaningful for some reason.

Now, we can do things for many reasons, what I referencing here is when we become the victims of habit and we stop making a choice.

In the movie groundhog day Bill Murray is stuck in time, and is reliving the same day for years and years and naturally some have asked how long?
He did learn to play the piano, become a expert card thrower, and he died a lot of times during these days.
This guy speculated he spent 10 years http://www.wolfgnards.com/index.php/2009/06/16/how-long-does-billy-murray-spend-in-grou there.

According to the writer he stated 30+ years.

So, what is it like, when you go from having and generating your own experience to compare that with your old way?

In Bill Murrays world I guess 30+ years.

/Robert Johansson

Ever tried to stop doing something you done for a long time?

Tough, hard or complicated involving frustrations, anger and leaps of faith?

Willpower is a cool thing, we can want something so bad we get a seizure looking at a dress in a shop or getting that smoke or drink or that last candy bar and I wont even start about sex.

But willpower don’t get us anywhere, right?

Sure it feels great, I am in command, I am deciding and then I do it again and again no matter the willpower as it last only as long we can keep doing it and in the end the chocolate wins out.

So, what is going on then as willpower doesn’t cut it, isn’t it a conscious and consciousness man we are? The Bandler rhetorical answer would be, ass, hole or such since he is very elegant with words.

He would say its your conscious mind that fucks things up, your unconscious runs thing its great and I go GEE Bandler surely that is why you took drugs, tried to escape your childhood in spite of all NLP as it allowed you to re frame anything…..right fellows?

So, we go and ask, what if I use Intention then what happens and what is the difference to that and willpower except the name?

Willpower is a wishing tool, hope, desires, but that is about it.
Intention however is a much more subtle yet powerful ally.Action is created with Intention, as you desire stop smoking for example, you can will it but the smoke wins out, or you can set Intention create a new context and stop in an instant. I met people that just decided and stopped, like a snap of the fingers they never had cravings, they never had smoke start over issues, they just stopped.

I noted nothing in NLP described that, there was no models to answer to that, and the answer was found in the work of Roye Fraser.

How come such a decision can be made, and then made without any withdraws?

Just like this?

Entering action.

What is required to create action?

Intention is the answer.

What creates Intention?

I never found any client had any issues to stop doing things, but some clients got this idea that they knew better than me, so they didn’t do what I suggested, as they didn’t do that, they ended up in a loop, their choice if you ask me so I let them be.

Sure I could have persuaded them but hey you got to respect peoples will right?

Think about something you are going to do or planning to do.
Now, as you think about that for a moment, let us investigate it, are you motivated to do it?

Most find that they need to build motivation to do things, or else they put it up forever, right?

The motivation is lacking due to we must set intention to create the action from a future standpoint.
Going to the beach, people as in according to NLP have different strategies to do things, some are more efficient and elegant even excellent.

Now, I ask people to enter and move into a future reality, as they do that, what is now goes into the past and stays there. So, if we focus our attention and where we focus it is important, and most people have no idea how to do that properly that is why RBIm includes that.

Its like Bodil, she get this perfect day thing going for 3 months and then start slipping from it, as she did that she didn’t ask herself, hey why am I doing this maybe she did ask that and as she should have asked, so how do I get back into that daily experience maybe she tried that and failed, and then she ends up asking me, again about that, so I go, I don’t do things like that, you fix it. Naturally she get pissed off, angry even, as she assumes as many does, that what she is experiencing is produced by her unconscious without her consent, right?

So, if you have this thing you going to do or planning to do, ask, where is my attention with this, going to do it, it is planned to do, its already done, where is your focus about this thing?

So, I ask, so its already done, you have that experience, and ask, so how is that and people go great, I feel like its easy and simple and they got all the motivation as they now have Intention with a future reference and the experience of it.

People got beliefs and assumptions about themselves if we don’t do things, we might ask, hey why don’t I enjoy this thing? And then think do I want to enjoy doing it if so, what would that be like enjoying it like this?

Nothing would ever be boring again.

Figure that be fun?

I set a goal this spring about my golf and I am failing it big time in results.
I got to make a swing change that simple put set me back a year.

Now, that makes me annoyed, irritated, frustrated and angry even.
Still I achieved the following, a swing that makes me hit the ball long, the way I wanted, I got pro level short game, and lacks consistency, if I had that I be shooting scores that I dream about.

Still even that I got a few more weeks playing golf even if summer is almost gone, I got a few rounds to go here. I think I got it down so I can make it consistent, and repeatable. But I failed the timetable and goal I got but I also achieved a lot of goals to get there.

I cant make the cut as I need to loose 6 shots in a few weeks and that seems not that plausible as I yet have only made 2 rounds under 80 this year, that I had a game that was 15 shots better doesn’t count as it wont matter as the result haven’t been there in the score.

I got the willpower alright down. The Intention is there also and my experience playing is great.

If we create action we can do a lot of things so we organize the action so it leads us where we want to go.

The future contextual reality.

So, its plausible to create a lot of action but if it isn’t channeled down the route we want to go we can spend a lot of time doing things that doesn’t work that well.

How do I know this works, when I never done it before?
Well we use faith.

Simple really.

That allow us to free up our brain, it now have a direction to go, future context with experience, it aligns that with our focus of attention, we take care of the belief loop and use faith which leaves us a open loop and we get a iconic experience.

Creating massive action towards where we want to be.

Now, I can have all the willpower but without Intention I don’t get anywhere.

That is why the RBIm drill teaches that specifically, its the single most important thing to get right, as it builds the rest.

I can teach a client to have a life, and fail big time with students.

My brain went, hum what is the difference here?

The client had a Intention set to get this fixed, and as I worked as I did, they just did what I taught so they got it down.

If they got stuck with therapy, which I had a few clients who been to months, weeks, years even 17 years…of therapy and people ask me why I think therapists suck ass helping people????????

GEEEEE what can be behind my reasoning that if I get to see someone to help me I will get better and be off on my way as fast as possible, right?

So, obviously I got a different intention doing change work or teaching or writing a blog as this as someone got to say things that simply doesn’t fit even when everyone else is sticking their head into the sand listening for bandlers famous last words.

So, run a mind probe, think about this experience this event you planned to do, and ask, if I did it, and it was already done, how would that be like for me in experience and if I already had done it, what kind of experience would I have liked to have doing it?

Your brain maybe goes, fun, sporty, easy, fast, efficient, sexy or whatever.

So, now you done it, had a experience you wanted to have doing it, so you now collide with beliefs, doing that task is neither easy nor fun, and you can change how the task is and I look at people telling me that and ask them how come other people enjoy doing the same thing and laugh doing it?

Its a choice, its a decision we make and then we make it real, so we assume learning RBIm for example is hard, though and IT CANT BE DONE, famous last words from Steve down under…
He not only was thinking about going to Sweden for the workshop, from frigging Australia that is like 25 hours of flight…for a 3 day workshop, wasn’t he nuts and then thinking there is no way he can learn it?

He went trough NLP training so I don’t blame him.

So, why even learn something before you start doing it thinking it is impossible for yourself? Why even try? Why even spend money on it????

He had faith I guess.

I spent money on things I consider today wasted, but at the time I thought gee, that sounds great and as I entered I found out I could already do most of those things taught, and I basically paid for a confirmation that I already possessed the skills taught,

Expensive and stupid today.

But then, I didn’t know what I know today.

I got 15+ years of 24/7 things about this field, and I sometimes forget people haven’t had such waste experiences about life or people and when I talk to people that don’t know me, they are in the what the fuck is he talking about mindset a lot.

Then I sing, then I dance and then I laugh in the shining light of life.

Enjoying life wonderfully

You can to, it isn’t a one man or girl show here.

/Robert Johansson
Part time hero and legend.

The NLP world is a funny one, its like this, John Grinder co-founder of NLP say you cant model a emotion and I guess he tried. I guess he missed the lecture of mirror neurons.

So another fool enters the mix, one that always recommend his books and such he wrote about patterns to deal with for example emotions.

A phobia is a V/K or A reaction often, which means, its a intense fear with a visual element and a Kinetic response (fear) but that isn’t the only way a phobia can be present just that it is the most common one. Phobia is handled in NLP by disassociating, meaning using various distractions (NLP techniques) to elevate the shift from a kinetic response to a robotic where the fear isn’t present anymore and often the practitioner associate something else to the past phobia.

Guilt is a reversed phobia according to the same NLP fool, which means the guilt is a emotion that the response to the emotion is the issue, blaming oneself for something one once did acts like one.

So we can say that guilt is a K/A or V response where the idea of NLP intervention is to create a subset of new representations or in English, replace the old ones with new ones.

Sounds cool and it is, I don’t argue with NLP I was after all one of the best out there of applying NLP practically at a level of Bandler/Grinder etc…

So can we model a emotion, of course we can.

I sat people in the same emotion before, and some might argue it isn’t the same emotion they have as they are not in the same body, but the emotion is the same, the word they might use might differ though which many think is the real answer, hey I think this is giddy, and some other go no I think its biddy, so they argue about the same emotion the just shared.

Emotions can be shared, that is the key essential aspect of rapport one of the pillars of NLP, and I cant say I am surprised by John Grinders typical response as he is a minimalist and obviously he would state that, as he don’t want do it and that he also teaches by discovery patterns, he sends people to do drills to discover things, seldom telling people about stuff.

So, basically the argument is moot if anyone asks me, sure you can model a emotion, but that isn’t what people want, they want their own version of it, remember the subjective reality people tend to have?

Its assumed in NLP that you find out how things works, using the mapping patterns, like the meta-model or other models so we find out how the phobia works then we can fix it, or we find out how guilt, regret, fear etc…so we can fix them.

Its assumed the way people do this using a process that is unconsciously produced can be altered using different NLP mind control techniques by addressing the process alone unconsciously meaning you have no idea what they just did, you just feel better.

To address the process you don’t need to know how they do it which is why so many NLP Practitioner sucks doing NLP as they apply NLP techniques as the phobia cure before they know if it is a phobia or not and then they blame the training and NLP when it didn’t work. That is why Bandler trainings are so bad quality nowadays.

The main difference here would then be, if the process is known, then the NLP Practitioner would know what to do to fix the issue and that is true if they do KNOW what is going on but to do that requires years of training to get proficient doing things like that.

Now, NLP is a detailed approach, you identify the problem, find the process how it works for the clients particular subjective reality, right? You then pull out a NLP technique to fix it, right?

RBIm for example is a whole or united approach, we fix the so called problem the same we would treat a broken leg, a mental issue, or emotional one the same way, with fixating us with the future experience which also then allow you to be flexible in your behavior, and create new behaviors where you had no such ones before.

Its the approach Milton H Erickson used one of the originators of NLP models.

This means, the future is held fixed, the experience of the future then create the new reality.

This includes things as behaviors and altering of processing and such.

So, RBIm becomes easy to learn, as shown in the video, as one learns to access a somatic/cognitive integration, this allows one to arise to a level of interaction with ones own mind where the need of NLP goes away, there isn’t any need to fix what is broken like fear or guilt, or regret and other so called distressed emotions.

Keeping the future constant, allows one to free up resources, where your able to go beyond yourself.

You become free.

You become a beacon of hope and light.
You become a hero or heroine in your own right.

Now, you need different skills to handle a broken leg vs a distressed freaked out psycho (unless you just shoot them – The Bandler approach), however, skills are different in logic than for example emotions or logic for that matter, as skills are often specific for the task at hand and obviously it would be handy to learn to breath methane, but our body cant do that and we cant with any tool teach peoples body to breath methane, we die, no matter the approach except if we use a suit with good air. But then obviously we don’t breath methane….

We just die.

Skills haven’t much to do with your focus of attention, your own experience and if your having a future held reference, in your interaction with co-workers, friends and such like family, what happens is you transcend the experience to what some would call a higher level.

For them, their interaction doesn’t display the same behavior they had for years, like a phobia or guilt or such, they instead feel great due to them using a future experience, without fixing the phobia or guilt which is in direct opposite of NLP – here you don’t need to fix the problem, you find out how to create a new future which seems like more fun if you ask me.

What is then the benefit of RBIm then doing it this way?

First you don’t need to debate NLP, and argue about why the noodle is al dente or if your dick is hard enough or if your pussy wet enough. NLP has become a debate of definition and that we all know can be open for debate a long time.

Did Bandler lie about NLP he most surely did and he stated they do that in NLP so you cant believe him nor John Grinder and it shows up in their track record over the years, you cant trust them. They will lie to you anytime they like due to them reality is a particular subjective view (theirs) and who cares if I tell this noob a lie? The noob might but then again they don’t question or think for themselves anyhow.

Every time I got to deal with the co-founders of NLP and their students they have I got to check the facts and figures as they will lie and distort everything as they see fit. I ask a Bandler trained trainer of NLP Gabe Gurerro a question and he goes paranoid and accuse me of stuff that isn’t true, and my brain goes, to much bandler time. Gabe lost his soul.

So, let ask us, hey RBIm, we got this dude or girl, I know your ladies read stuff here also, they got an emotion, like guilt, fear, and as it is tied to a context, and has specific behaviors, like running away, thoughts happening, feelings arisen, and the nervous system become cold, it activates the primal brains, fight or flee response which funny enough is mostly flee for some reason.

So I go, it is what our brain is trained to do trough evolution, we must remember things to survive that is what our brains are doing for us, it allow us to remember events we can hardly recall so we can identify the emotion first, ever thought about that, why we cant talk about the phobia fear at all? If we talk about the phobia, the client goes into emotional response, just like that.

If we talk about guilt, we can talk all day.

So, phobia fear, associated.
And guilt, dissociated,
and the NLP people want you to run guilt dissociation to the phobia and phobia to the guilt. Meaning the inverse process of the fear and guilt, is applied which would work.

Now, the issue here that I argue to them is that the NLP people don’t know what they are doing due to them don’t know how peoples subjective reality works. Its funny as they study that and don’t know how it works. Now, they then develop means to handle that inconsistency, which allowed Bandler to use hypnosis and even more to confuse and alter your brain chemistry and I would think twice before letting him do that as he will lie if it suits his purposes.

NLP always works within a contextual reality.
That is how it is taught and trained.

I was highly effective using NLP as I did NLP that did work not what was taught.

RBIm is the continuation of that, its not like I teach stuff that is old or was good 10 years ago, I teach what I find to be the most effective approach based upon research and tests.

The phobia or guilt exists for the individual for them it is real, right?
Its not like their brain knows the difference anyhow, or they be feeling silly or foolish after understanding their fear or guilt isn’t real, its the brain believing it still is…

If you was fucked in the ass, unwillingly, for many that leaves scars, not just in the ass, but emotional ones also, blame, guilt, shame, and such with rage, anger, frustration, and a lot more can form a individuals life. (Anyone can be fucked in the ass, guys can be raped the same way girls are)

They were betrayed, assaulted, and such a event is traumatic and tragic for the individual, no matter where in the world it is, currently, all the females in a country is raped and raped again from the aggressors, its a old way to make sure they feel bad for a long time.

Now, the event did happen once, it might have been years, it wont matter for the individual they now have this events playing in their mind (mmemory), they recall it have flashes, they go back to the event, (context) And they get stress reactions from it, (behaviors forms) they evade people, they become shy, distrusting and so on.

So, you come in and use NLP to them, and what will happen as NLP wont work that well then.

First rule of ferengi, never go back to old stuff.

Our brain creates experience from a specific set of configurations, called context, and as long it is doing that, other contexts simply isn’t existing then.

I have taken bad issues, bad clients, and run them with everything they once had a problem with, and they have no responses at all to their so called problem with me.

Obviously, they don’t think much about it.

Its due, that their problem is real for them, for them they had it for years and years, it was bad, and as they had it so long we believe it is true for us, it actually exists and I go, its all a memory…it cant be real.

Unless you want to make the argument that our memory is real..as the actual event itself with its experience?

No?

Why not`?

If you feel bad, for any reason, its your memory that activates with your current context and you believe it real within a confined criteria of course.

Now, tragic events happen, shit happens, however how we choose and decide, how to move on and go from that, is all that actually matters.

I been ill for 10 years now, I cant work the capacity I want, no matter what I tried, it haven’t get me to the point where I want things to be. This doesn’t mean I give up, or stop trying.

One of the benefits with RBIm, is a small sideffect, you cant feel bad unless you want to.

As you learn about how your brain functions and how it does things, you stop the debate of NLP, what the definition is as you understand it doesn’t matter much, as your using a new one that works better and you don’t need to debate that as you got a life to live.

Do you want to feel happy every day?

Or be able to shift your experience from happy, to joyous, to sad, to excited or anything else on a whim?

That is what you learn here, looking into the future.

Some asked me, do I require visualization skills after I learn the RBIm drill to then access future experience and my answer is no. You can use pen and paper if you like to do it.

For me modeling emotions is a moot point, it can be done, not so useful though, as its more useful teaching people to feel emotions of happiness, joy, peace, perfection, harmony, in balance etc….

But to do so, we also need to understand, if evolution has brought us the ability to remember events as real years later as if they are happening now, instead of being a past memory, we could assume that one single approach would be possible and plausible if the brain is acting the same way for people doing just that….

For me I don’t work with guilt or fear as phobias anymore, its to easy.

The same approach can be used for phobia and guilt in spite of what the NLP trainer Steve Andreases tells you as I know and he don’t, obviously.

He believes he knows which if you ask me is a dangerous approach as he will tell you things as they are true, and seduce you into thinking it is true when it cant be. So, yes, the same approach can be used for broken legs, emotions and mental issues in spite of what Steve Andreases believes to be true.(he fails to consider category of functions in spite of writing a book about that subject heh)

Don’t take my word for it, use the RBIm process, its on video with explanations, its all there.

Doing the drill achieving Intention allows you to suddenly, experience something you moist likely never do.

Going all out.

Think about that, if you could go all out, feeling like happy the whole day, the week, the month of the year, how would that be for you?

Giddy?
To good to be true?

The response you just had to my questions shows the unconscious reservations you have and your defense screen most likely just pooped up. We cant have people going around like O´Leary with mushrooms and drop in and tune out all the time as a world with happy people just sucks to much.

It is possible, its doable, its here within your grasp.

I got the secrets, the answers and the mystical connections.

I am a hero.
Yours

/Robert Johansson
Making coffee at least I got skills for that.