In my work with dyslexia, there been cases where its not just the reading or writing skills that is in question, sometimes the kids been trough tough times in school where other kids been mobbing them for some reason.

Now, working with the future reference, and creating a new future, free of past links and references, for some might not seem possible.

Kids in that aspect are always easier to work with then adults. Many adults forms given the environment a judgment call that there is nothing one can do about their reading skills, they are now, handicapped for life, and the current science and approaches in pedagogical advances are at best, really bad.

So, many form, its no good its useless to try to get back to reading and writing, its much better to accept the reality of the situation, I am doomed for life.

So, I meet this kid, and he have had a bad rap, his teachers believe he cant use the bus from school, his antisocial etc…and have little to no understanding about him or his life.

So, I have a case here, with me trying to teaching him to read and write but obviously I also must handle the emotional baggage he has with his school.
I got to do that with his parents, and make sure this transfers to his school.

His abilities are low, self esteem is low, his motoric skills are low, his speaking abilities are disturbed by his background from another language.

So, I work on reading and speaking first, building a new system of that, and as that progress so well, I build upon that into the motoric skills, allowing him to hold a pen properly to write letters much more easily and more elegant due to him holding a pen the wrong way. Now, obviously this haven’t been noted in school, don’t they teach kids how to hold their pen or even make sure they do?

However, this kids go from, worse to good, in months.

So, I get this two kids, brother and sister, reading skills are low, writing was ok, and they have real bad issues with the grades.
One session, the brother suddenly started to get such good things going in school, he was accused of cheating, one session brought him from bad to really good.

Now, how can I do such improvement when teachers and such cant?

I know how the brain processes information, and I also know how to organize their brain to read but also to comprehend and assimilate knowledge faster.

I get this girl, age 11, and she been trough everything since age 4, tests, and all, and she spoke like a really handicapped kid, her speech was really bad, she was not happy to see me or to work with me as she been trough so much, I mean age 4 to age 11?
that is like 7 years of NO GOOD COMPETENT TEACHING.

So, I look at her body language, she is unhappy, angry, and I look at her and hear her talk and I tell her and her parents, ok this is what we will do, so I spend 3 hours basically making sure her voice starts to get back on track. Now as I do that I look at her and tells her, you feel ashamed as you cant speak properly?
She goes, yea, but she haven’t told me that, so how do I know?
So, I go on removing that, letting her build a new future reference, where she speaks properly.

Now, I tell her and her parents to call me after two weeks, and then as far, I am still waiting for them to call me.
Many times the effect in what I do, is so powerful and effectful, the few instances I need to work several times, are rare.

So, I saw her the next day, and now she was smiling, looking forward to work with me, why?

She had learned everything I did worked.

7 years of not working and 3 hours trying things with me and everything I did, improved her speech, her reading comprehension so she was now sitting, waiting to do things as she now got it, she wasn’t handicapped for the rest of her life, now there was not just hope, there was faith that she be as every other kid, normal.

I guess that was so cool working with kids, they go, so you teach this cool things and I get better?

Yea…

Cool!

/Robert Johansson

In NLP the idea is to build a powerful motivation system called propulsion which is a push/pull system, one negative and one positive to drag and push you to do it.

That is to design a motivation system to make you do things no matter what.
Its the way Richard Bandler built motivation, by trying to build massive enhanced states of intense feelings to bear upon that notion people need massive propulsion to get anywhere, and that is true in space where the propulsion might need a good push.

Now, I get asked this, so what do you do then in RBIm that doesn’t do that?

One of the ideas here is when we need motivation, its due to causality, its due to a limitation inherent in the system or reality in the individual.
So a Bandler propulsion system is designed to deal with that inherent, weakness of the human desire and basically force the individual in spite of their beliefs.

So, this guy at the workshop asked to get motivation, now I looked at him, sure, so, what is it that you need motivation for?

Its like this, to be motivated, we need a reason.
I don’t understand why Bandler of all people would design a system that actually makes it harder to get motivated, not easier and doing so, with his co-creation of NLP one has to assume he is kinda smart doing things?
Why is NLP such enhance to overcome stuff?
Its like that human beings suddenly cant do shit unless they get into these highly charged states, and if you ever been to a Bandler workshop you know it, high energy states, big words, and channeled patterns of change behaviors.

That is what Bandler does, he see you as limited.
He runs patterns on you, to let you achieve freedom to break out of the personal jail you built.
He isn’t empowering you, he basically is doing the opposite.

So, what then, well as this guy asked about motivation, and the reasons for it, I told him I don’t do such work, I don’t work with the past.

I work with the future, so what is it like when your already achieved and done this, thing?
So, elicitation of the future experience, right, its done deal, now, as I did that, he went from highly worried and ridden with anxiety to a sitting, Buddha more or less from one day to the next.

Now, behaviors, are happening when reality changes, and it does so when we alter the experience to a future one where this thing, is already done, and as it is, then as it is done, you already have the behaviors, and there is no reason anymore to get motivated.

Its already happen, and now, its a cruise.

No need to build massive feelings to stay on track to stay focused, all one does is to keep track of the experience created, and let it happen.
That is the faith basically with a knowing how it works in advance.

Take something you don’t do and don’t want to do.
I don’t ask you to do it or anything, I ask you, do you wanna do it?
If you get one of those, and you say, yea I like to do it BUT I wont as I am not motivated to do it.

Its like smoking, people want to stop BUT they cant.
They cant bring about the proper motivations, ie reasons to stop.

So, I ask, ok here is the deal, let say you have already done it, the thing you want to do BUT don’t do.
BUT I don’t wanna do it?
Yes you do, your just lacking proper motivation to do it, right and if you had that you be doing it right?

Yea sure!

BUT you don’t, as you don’t have the proper reasons to actually do it, right?
Yea…

Now, reasons are the source to belief, we assume, to do something we don’t do, we need reasons to get our butt to do it, right?

Ok, so people try motivation systems, they do not work that well.
Bandlers propulsion system doesn’t work that well as it is a artificial system that people don’t use naturally as the brain isn’t wired for such designs.

Its due to the weakness and flaw of NLP and the designs of DHE and NHR later on, its inherently not so useful to run highly charged states to overcome and change.

So, I go, when you already have done this task, and I know, you don’t want to really do it, and you don’t need to do it, all I ask, is to get a future experience, when this task is done and done.
We don’t want you to change anything about you or anything else about this, all I do want is this chance to let you to have the experience you would have if you had done it.
Would that be fine with you?

Now, since RBIm works with the structure of how human brains actually changes, its so much easier and faster and the idea is that its no pain, no struggle no, anxiety, no complicated moves to make it work.

How can a kid go out and play a whole day, and never get bored?
He or she don’t lack motivation ever, its only after age 4 the kid you have starts to get bored and then they get reasons, to do it, aha!
A human pattern is now being taught inside the society, where kids are trained to respond to reasons.

By getting access to the pre-age 4 experience, having done it, then the motivations and reasons, stops to exist, they simply go away.
I done and talked to people about this, and they all suddenly, realize, when pointed out, they old reason idea is gone.

They suddenly don’t need to be motivated.

Its like real magic.

And its only magic, when you don’t know how its done.

This is why athletes, do things they do, due to them suddenly understand to get results, they if they do it like this, then they have all the motivation required without even needing a reason.

What I have had trouble with was to the way to explain this.
I spent 6 years to get to this point where I know when I teach things, I can get across the individual so they understands the somatic distinction in combination with cognitive attention/Intention, so they can set the marker and be back into the experience, within the context they so desire.
If its the Mythoself that is done to create a sense, no matter the context in many ways, across context doesn’t give that idea justice.

Doing that without needing to explain using words but using a somatic motion allows a much better getting the message across.

One thing I watched Joseph do, and as he did that, he didn’t use calibration, he used what he calls adumbration, and his own explanation of what he do, well basically sucks.
I didn’t understand that due to him being unable in spite of his so called precision in language explaining concept stuff that many people so admire.
I didn’t understand his answer either as he used so many metaphors doing that explanation I just knew, he doesn’t know what he talks about.
That from the guy with extreme precision in words?

Anyone else bought that bullshit?
That he actually is precise?

That is what happens when people use NLP to draw forth the assumptions about how reasons and beliefs works.
John Grinder did the same thing, he also explained his precise wordings and meaning exactly what this reference to as NLP allows a precise meaning to be stated and referenced accordingly, due to how people make comparisons, Grinder and Carmen assumed, they are precise in their words and reference and they also stated all we have is neurological and semantic transforms and we can never know actual reality?

COME ON!!!

Didn’t anyone else notice that pattern in the bullshit book “whispering in the wind” than me?

So how can we take anything what Grinder and Carmen says or write with any kind of precision when they basically invalidate themselves in the process doing so?

Think about that for a reason.

/Robert Johansson

Selling a product, are fitted with qualities where the marketing is done as the product is well known what it is.
Now a service, is somewhat different in the notion of, what it is.

If I would define what I sell its consistency.
Eyebrows might go up, and the question mark forms, hum heh what do you mean, consistency?

Many teaches to how to fix things in how to handle life and stuff that comes up, or to teach you to be prepared to deal with things as they come along.
That is nice, and makes it definitely easier to do and handle stuff.

Our brain, or evolution have set us with a brain that is divided, its easy to influence someone, to let them change their beliefs and perceptions of life, not many people stay consistent.
When people are consistent, they have this thing called ontology, a specific set, of nuances where the expressions they have in the body language, and obviously in their expression towards observation from others, they simply, is consistent as they are, some might say they are trustworthy in that consistency as they are always the same.

Now, since people like to live in causality and the life of reactions, instead of consistent expressions I understand why its hard to get it.
As, the message sent, is not the message received, even when it is.

If I tell you you look fantastic, and I really do mean it, many don’t take that directly, as it is, the message, but alter that, some call that process a NLP one when generalizations, deletions and distortions happens in the semantic forms.
But that isn’t really exactly true, and NLP is wrong about that one, they Grinder and Bandler did a huge error when developing NLP and the same error exist in psychology as they actually model the development what people did in related fields to achieve results.

This is called excellence, where an individual has achieved a better result, than the average, so this individual uses an approach that allows him/her to be better in regard to the result achieved compared to others in the field, which then was distilled and modeled, to produce a formula called a Model, to teach the patterns to achieve the same results.

So, when the message sent, you look fantastic, is received, it doesn’t end in the same format as it was sent. Now, people having a hard time with irony, might find the above somewhat eyeopening as it explains the lack of understanding irony.

Each time we send a message as the above, the individual much likely will do a comparison.
Now, that is one of the pillars I sell, the RBIm approach allows someone to map and understands the comparisons, and how to deal with them on a structural level and not a process one as NLP does it or NHR/DHE/New code NLP etc…

The comparison is the fluid reception people have to deal with things that happens, instead of being consistent, they shift their stuff all the time to meet a specific comparison.
Now, that is a good thing some think when we talk social interactions, being such adjustable must really be good in social competence, and it might look like that, but then your only matching and mirroring the things that goes on from those you meet, not showing yourself.

NLP allows you to be a camelont, hiding, matching and mirroring, people to make them like you, but basically they just become like you as you match them and show them how they are.
You might come to believe you show them who you are or how well you create rapport, but basically you just mirrored those patterns they have, so they like those, not what your doing.

So, using NLP you can be a really good camelont, but basically, you a flawed impression for those involved and that is why NLP was called out being a tool of influence called manipulation.
Most people have no real defense to that, if you match and mirror a girls dreams of a white knight, its easy to get them, doing your bidding, but then later on, you must keep this up indefinitely, as they fall for the dream, not you.

Being consistent, is the same level that Arnold Schwarzenegger, Robert Redford, Bruce Willis, etc..that they might be good actors, but they basically, also the same time are consistent, within a specific set of expressions.

Now, this also builds beliefs and causality, that even if your really good, the audience wants you in the same role, that did happen to the gangster role played by Cagney in public enemy from 1931.
That role made him definitely for the public, the nr1 in such movies.
And that is the minefield we all wander on, the ability to understand that we do walk on such fields, allow us to separate and keep the differences between consistency or fluid behaviors from the source they arrive from.

Being consistent, is something that cut across several context, it isn’t a generalization directly as much as it is a behavioral response. Now, if all the words we can use are 3, as generalization, distortion and deletion we also leave out other nuances, that allow us to arise above such petty claims NLP does.

Semantics are important to a degree, its how we can communicate to one another, and get a message across, if we also the same time understand, the message sent, seldom is the message received.

As I did the workshop, some people noted, but this is what You write about I your blog?
Yes, expecting anything different?
Well, yea….

So, even when reading this blog, and maybe enjoy, like or dislike etc…the impact this has in real interaction is much different, and I understand that, but I am still doing what I wrote about here, I don’t change, my approach when teaching, I still teach, find the future experience, map the NOTNLP Concept as you do that, elicit this, identify with it, and as this is going on people might object or make excuses, and then we tell them we ain’t doing changes to you or your stuff.

So, as I write about that, that is what I do, when teaching a workshop, as I am consistent there, but people obviously take what I write, compare that to what they know, which obviously, isn’t the same I teach, and they suddenly become surprised?

Its like telling people, well, what if you kissed your spouse, and every time you did that, it would be like the very first kiss, each and every time you did it?

The brain, makes habits which every drug addict knows, each time they tried the drug for the first time, they get a extra boost, it felt much better then later as they tried in vain to feel the same as they did the very first time.
Habits are like that, it dull our senses, as what we do, become generalized, and allow us to slip into a blanket of foggy slippy perceptions.
We start to believe this is life.
And then, we can allow a sensation, as being fresh and new each and every time, and never let the experience, being anything else than it is, new and fresh forever.

Now, this for a drug addict might seem as good news and if they still want to do drugs after what I taught isn’t that likely, but then again that is me.

Now, people in NLP cant do that, new and fresh as they all become succumb to the habits, they get dull their senses wanders off.
They cant understand my approach as it is, melted into their own understandings their own comparisons.

As I did the workshop with Joseph back in 2003, and as I run this I noted it started a process, in how I understand, what I been taught and naturally, this allowed me to stop doing NLP and hypnosis, and I don’t do such anymore as they are to slow for me.
I don’t do DHE or NHR or other such, as those approaches also, is about fixing stuff.

DHE is about design, to design mental tools, to do your bidding but then again, its a engineers approach to fix life, wouldn’t you agree?
You got to wonder what bandler needs fixing still after 40+ years.

So, for me, consistency is what I offer, across context, no matter where you are, at home at work, and having the ability to do so, fresh and new every time, no matter the time involved, is something that is possible to learn, so each time, you eat breakfast, kiss your spouse, its all new and fresh.

For most, its like that for a time, maybe just once, and then for some, its like that, forever.

That for me is worth the work I done as far, as it is all fresh and new.

Still 15+ years down the road.

Peter Jackson, said after doing the lord of the rings and as he did those, that he would love to be able to watch the movie fresh and new due to him being involved with the movies, had to see each scene hundreds of times.
Many complain about my posts being long and reading them is so, well boring for some, and they seldom know or thinks about me who not just write them but also reads them more than once.

I can write, in many different ways, but this, way is consistent and been consistent for all the years I been on the net.

I exposed Gabe Guerrero a NLP trainer on the net, I exposed Micheal hall the meta-states guy as being not consistent to what they taught.
So much for their messages.

Oliver is doing hopefully a small audio interview with me this Friday if the tech works and it will be online later on his website if all works out.

Instead of reading, you at least could hear some of this from the horses mouth.
Until then, why not rent the movie, 50 first dates with Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymoore?

/Robert Johansson