Marketing

posted in: RBIm - No Comments

So as I continue to do the RBIm technology one might ask me, hey dude, I would ask why I should choose RBIm over for example any NLP with Bandler, Grinder or Dilts or even some other methods out there as 3D Mind with Tom Vizzini or Mythoself with Joseph Riggio.

Now, could you provide any reason legitimate why I should even consider any workshop with you Robert ever?

Fair enough as my position would be, hey those guys are kinda big in the circuit doing stuff all over the world.

So let me heed some advice,

RBIm are a new technology, and my aim and goal with the technology is really simple, to give you all the power to use and decide for yourself how you want your life to be, from today and the rest of you life.
I aim to give you how to do it, not just talking about it, nor just displaying what isn’t working with NLP, that what I do on my blog from time to time as NLP for me is a dead technology.

Benefits of the RBIm are really simple, you establish a blueprint, where you connect or link what you focus on and awareness of that with a motion/somatic movement. From that linked connection you then can add any future experience you want to experience, at home, at work, at your free time that allows you to decide in each moment what it is for you.

If we talk relations, you can every time you talk to your kids, friends, spouse have a new and fresh experience with them, that is just perfect each and every time.
That every time you have sex, its like having sex for the first time, every time again and again.
No growing stale over time then…
No viagra…needed

You can act as a role model for you kids but many aside that like to be successful at work, to be able to be at peace, in harmony and providing a excellent performance in what they do.
No matter if there is stress, your boss arguing, your co-workers having a bad day, you just sail along your current experience, smiling if you like, focused and determined if you like, your choice.

The RBIm technology is really simple, its like this at a RBIm workshop, the very first day I go trough how to establish this blueprint this link between the somatic and cognitive functions, to make your focus and awareness being a embodied reference, and from there, when people have made the distinction how that is like, we access any future experience, you would want to have.
You be doing that, and be coached how to do it, and then also learn to notice, how its like to have a embodied experience, for some maybe the very first time they had one.

There is evidence produced behaviors that we have when properly having a embodied experience.

The next day, this continues, to make sure everybody knows what to do, how to noticing the signals and how to measure the behaviors and experience they have actually shifts their perception and how one perceive the world from this.

There is also the skill to note what the new position is like in the new wanted future experience like flow, perfection, at peace, etc…and this is the main focus of day 2, to note where ones position is in this new experience.

During this type of workshop, you gain and get the power to rule over your own consciousness, each and every time for the rest of you life.
Now, this is done without resorting to solve a problem the NLP approach, or the 3D Mind approach.

Now, Mythoself aims differently and even if RBIm as a technology was built from modeling Joseph Riggios presentation it is vastly different in how its taught and applied due to one major difference, I don’t use old past references (memories) when doing this, I use this to set a fresh and new blueprint in how its like to have a embodied reference, before behaviors exist.

Now, NLP cant do that, and every class you take either it be NLP, new code NLP, DHE, NHR, 3D mind or such, cant do this, ever.

Now, some as John La Valle often speaks about behaviors, to get a red Ferrari you need behaviors to get it, but then he don’t explain, what behaviors do you need, how do you know you got them and all that is left out in that tale from him.
Its left out due to him, he cant teach you that and if he cant who spent 20+ years with the best NLP trainer and co-founder of NLP Richard Bandler then one must ask some serious questions of why.

I get a lot of people, dissatisfied with NLP workshops, trainings and such and many ask me, please no metaphors. People in NLP think people need to hear fairy tales, told in nested loops, and provide no more than that and assume people accept that as an explanation?

So, I tell them, OK what do you want then?
They tell me, and I say, OK do this:

Apply RBIm, elicit this and link this and then, as this is elicited, you know how its like (made distinction), then you access a future experience, and then have that in this context.

Like Oliver did, as he asked me, what is the difference between NOTNLP and its protocol and RBIM, I had to show him live unedited over the internet using Skype how to apply this for himself so he could understand, by his own experience what it was like.

It was WOW!

Now, the third day its a cocktail party day where you explore as many experiences in the time provided using the RBIm first and then access future desired states of consciousness you would like to have.

Now, in conjunction with that, I also provide support using Skype both audio and video after to support your ongoing progress in your life so you can make sure to be using this no matter where you live in the world.
That is why I like small groups, I can spend time, with you on a personal level, interacting and making sure I understand you and your motives.

The RBIm technology is for me simple, but also for you not so much due to how your used to think in problems and causality, how can anyone just bypass our current believed reality and suddenly end up just doing good in basically no time at all, and more importantly, they themselves have the power to do so?

My aim my whole time with NLP and such have been to get to a point where what I do and teach is so simple, you cant fail doing it, you wouldn’t need a ton of practice and knowledge of how to do it.
I never was able to do so using NLP, as unconscious installations isn’t the future of NLP.

RBIM requires you to focus and move your body, and no previous knowledge at all.

No, beliefs, no knowledge at all, and every explanation or understanding you might have before you do it, I wont answer.

When you do the RBIm, and gain access and identify the distinction you need to have for a embodied experience, that is the moment you understand,

the power is now yours to wield, forever.

Choose wisely.

In regards to workshops, books, CD, DVD, or such, you can go with the old technology as NLP.
You can then try to find the secret that you never get there.

RBIM, its the new technology of human empowered consciousness

Yours.

/Robert Johansson

Questions and missunderstandings

posted in: Life, RBIm - No Comments

I was asked.
Quote” In terms of just doing…I have a question about contextual reality or one’s embodied conceptions. If one is living a best future now then one can continually make it even deeper, better by continuously pulling a better contextual reality or embodied conception continuously. Hence, how does timing and interval of the pull from the future now come into play? End quote”

You cant really make it better, its not what your doing that make it work, its the system in play that draws the experience allowing it to for your brain to be “new”.

If you look at the movie, 50 first dates with Drew Barrymore and Adam Sandler, its a comedy but it also shows the character Drew plays have a curse or a gift.
For her, every day, is “new” for him not so much.

So, here we have a situation unheard of in NLP.
We can have a new experience that still allows us to have a memory of it but each time we have it, its new for us, which contradicts everything people learn to do in NLP, this is just better.

It shouldn’t be possible.

Normally people if they have an experience, it gets stale, old, grow boring.
Its due to how the brain categorize experience, if its done it gets stored into long term memory, allowing us to build a new learning about what we experience so we can prepare accordingly to a similar future experience. That is also what people use to get stuck or limited in life.

Aadam Sandler use the normal way people learn and experience, and it grows old fast as he remember each event, for Drew it doesn’t.
Now, a combination between those two is how this works in RBIm.
Its also how it should work using Mythoself btw.

Here, we have the experience, we like, and each time you access it, its new in a way you can understand, and still you remember having it before but this is access to the way we experience life new and fresh each time so it cant never grow stale due to how you have accessed and set the brains experience.

Its why I can talk to athletes, or to people having had traumas, and let them produce and perform so much better and feel fine without any so called problem oriented resolution as in NLP.

The athlete can undo his old patterns, just like that and now have a new and set action to do, that is free from the old one, making sure we can do what is done in the moment.
Shot by shot if you like the old classic.

A trauma is then an experience people have that is set in a context, that then generalize to build patterns or responses to the world from this established and learn experience. This means for people doing that, they always run the trauma and what they learned from that even in situations that has nothing to do with it.
This slowly generalize for them to build the reality it is as it is and nothing can be done with it, as they sure enough tried to move on.
They tried to talk themselves out of it, they tried to look and think positive, but nothing changes their behavior and they feel then guilty and often ashamed they fail and some even have fear about doing anything new due to the responses that happens for them.

So even if I use the example of an individual who had a trauma the structure is the same with other stuff people learn and do.
They cant get out from it.

Now, I used NLP effectively, much likely as effective as Bandler, Grinder and such people. None I know of that I met was even close to what I could do and did.

Now, I also noted that I had clients that simply had such a different ways that when I used NLP, those couldn’t be classified doing NLP with, now at the time I didn’t know why I just noted that some did things as I noted like to investigate why things works as they do or don’t.
I had clients that other NLP trained people had worked with and some was the best of the world had failed with where I succeeded.

Normally the brain stores responses, and those responses we use to decide what behavior we shall use here.
This is contextual variables, as those becomes present, the brain fires of the behavioral set reaction.
Now, those can both be imagined and real, the brain doesn’t know the difference.

So, as this happens, we then use this as a reference position or the point of origin we use to navigate trough the world, when interacting with family, friends, school, work and such.
Now, this might go any way, either the individual learn to accept the world and new impulses and move beyond the trauma and establish a new reference or they blend them with the new which in some cases causes anxiety, fear, guilt, shame and such.
Its due that we must use contextual reference, if not we go nuts.

Every time anyone loose their sanity, they loose context.

So, what we do then is to build a new future, a new future experience, and when its set, free from past memories, the behavior changes and since that is dependent on the responses and actions the brain takes, we then successfully have re-set and replaced the old position due to now, our behavior is different.
Now, its doable to do so using NLP but then you need to add something new, to replace the old or else it will go back to its original state.
Heck even Richard Bandler speaks about that time and time again on his workshops…replace what was taken out

He cant do, what I teach.

Since we don’t need to add anything as the process allow us to sync the brain developments doing the RBIm set blueprint, and then use that as a new reference, and then we are free to actually choose what to have as an experience, meeting the criteria of NLP of choice.

RBIm is the new NLP, just another name that works better and easier than NLP ever will.

If people had to little choice, here we can design the set reference, so it allows people to make any choice, without being concerned with what is going on with their state of consciousness first.

People in pain, seldom are not that easy to talk to, they cant believe anything else than their current pain. (taught current experience, linked with set contextual reference)
This is how life is for them.(set factual evidence belief and no, it isn’t what bandler teaches)
Then everything that is going on, always will be from that set contextual position in life for them.

Now, they will have hope, they will try to overcome this, and it can be done in numerous of ways, but all those are problemoriented, they all assume that the set position they work with is real.
Every client I worked with come in and tell me, this is real, and naturally it is, for them, not for me.

I point out where they could go, using NLP tools that was slow and often painful even if I could in some cases do miracles, that wasn’t enough as there was to much that was unexplainable.

Reality is how we perceive the world, right now.

How you know it, is how you react to what I write or not.
What are you going to do today?

Its all how you perceive what is real for you.

Are you killing dogs, cats, birds? Burning them and smiling?
No?
Some are, for them that is real and natural and fun.

For serial killers the power of having a human life in their hand is the greatest feeling ever.
Its like being GOD.
Obviously a penis compensation but hey.

Are you helping out in the neighbor hood, are you swearing about your neighbors behaviors?
Are you annoyed with the work, your boss, co-workers or friends or even the family?

NO?

some are.

Its what the reality is for them, its how they perceive the world.

Bandler and others don’t like what I write as I am telling you guys the truth in what is better and what they cant do. I am open to questions and answers them to my best ability from how I understand what I done and does.
Good luck doing that with Bandler and the likes.

Now, reading all the above most likely affected your state, your current consciousness, and for some, they cant re-set or get into the wanted experience after such readings due to them lacking the access to the vestibular system and the balance of the brains.(cant do it with their anchoring skills from NLP either)

A few years back I had to trow out a student due to him not listening to me, I called the cops to remove him, now this set for everyone in the room a real time traumatic experience, big time, and I spent 9 hours to clear it up for them as I taught the stuff I did.
I did that since it was my responsibility to do so but I also did that using the vestibular system to set the wanted experience so they wouldn’t be burden with the traumatic experience.
They could however as I told them get a real experience how crazy people could be when they appeared perceivable normal at first glance.
The student went and become a NLP Trainer with John Grinder.
Guess that is how much I give for their so called calibrations licensing trainers.
It sucks.

Now, when someone experience what some called a imprint, this becomes often a way the brain navigates as it acts as a reference.
Now, some girls often have low self-esteem, they often believe they are not worthy often worthless.
Now, that is a social construct, they grow up learning to be that, and for the life of me, as this is true all over the world, that is a social construct, not just a cultural one.

But I digress, when one enters the same experience, having a new and fresh experience, and still remembers having the old one and this doesn’t generalize as any other experiences, you then are safe to say your having a embodied experience.

That is pure perfection.

/Robert Johansson

Just do it!

posted in: Life, RBIm - 8 Comments

Got some block, some limitation, some emotional, psychical or mental thing that drives you nuts or just overall crazy?

No matter what you tried, no matter what you tested it wont matter it holds you back.

You tried, yoga, you tried books you tried the CD, the DVD, the internet, the classes of NLP and new age as a last resort but still, its eludes you.

It just wont work.

Try RBIm for a life that works.

Most people just want something small and easy, like be happy, or have the stress removed or to do things easily.

So, here we set a new structural format, a new way of starting over to just do it.

I am applying this RBIm format to Golf, I apply it for the every day chores, the stuff I need to do, want to do and must do.

Doing that, lets me to do them, easily and smooth.
I can decide how its going to be to every task, or doing it a more general how a whole day should be like.

But people might believe, but you gifted, your talented your born lucky.

I am just like you, and people believe what they believe, still this doesn’t change facts, I am as normal people can be except that I like to investigate and invent stuff that makes peoples life, healthier, happier and funnier.

I set a goal today, that runs out the 1 of June, now, I seldom set goals, I did that to apply this and test this, how does this work using this protocol of RBIm to that?

Now, first I turned into this excuse I had, and it was a negation, so I thought gee, what to do now, run the NOTNLP protocol or do the RBIm with a new blueprint one?
ah those Choices.

So I decided to run the RBIm, as this would let me to an extent do a good test run with this.
So, I just did that, took me 5 minutes.

When elicited and set, it build a new structure and allows us to explore and experience what stuff is like ahead of actually having it.

Now, for some that sounds mystical, its kinda like that paradox of time travel, where we could go back in time, and then meet people and change or alter history, but here we travel to the future, allowing us to get an insight, aha this is how its like doing this and experience this, ahead of that I done it, as the brain will always fight a change if its not aligned according to the two major brain developments.

That is why you are stuck, or limited, you can only access one portion of this, and doing NLP or such methods might gain access to the other but it does so trough already establish sensory channels.

Its like asking people at the workshop, so what is your best day and how is it like?, now naturally people use memory, to choose a past best day, instead of going into the future, and solely, choose, the very best day ever.
After been asked and shown a future best day, this allow us to directly go there to just do it.
Then be shown how one holds this position no matter what, and every time we have it, its fresh and new.

Now, this could be true for you to.

You could have days that are exceptional, unorthodox and wonderful no matter where you live or do.

Its only a matter of where you have a set experience, from past or the future (your choice really), and then, build a bridge between that so its happening today and then, knowing how this works, allows you to just do it more and often as things like change or such becomes, so easy.

You might go from boring to exciting, from ordinary to happy, from silly to confident, from a looser to a winner.

You can go from stress to harmony without shifting anything in your environment.
I had a sister who just went stressed out at home until I showed her own experience of serenity.

Its doable, easier than ever before, meaning it isn’t simple but at least we can get a good practice program running.

But hey, when the audio goes live, you can try this yourself, listening to the process, will aid you doing this.

So, what is it that you want to, just do?

/Robert Johansson

Well being

posted in: Life, RBIm - No Comments

What is the difference really?
If you ask me, its how well you feel daily.

Well being, the way we enjoy the daily tasks and daily things we do, no matter where we are or live, is an ability to be, in the moment living from an embodied approach, this changes how you perceive everything that is currently going on for us.

And how we judge this is by, behavioral responses.
No matter what we say, we must use behavior as a way to measure, as this will allow us to pinpoint and do the things that actually works.

If someone has an issue a problem, its easy to assume, to fix that, we fix the source of the issue.
If one has a external issue with a step mom, boss or such and believe the problem is with the boss or step mom, one must understand, how we feel, has nothing to do with other people.

If one has a internal issue, one where a trauma or such has caused damage, and we believe we must live our lives like this as, well if it once happen, well it can never be undone.

I often look at them and say, well the funny thing with people is that they believe this bad thing will actually happen exactly the same way again…
So, if you was robbed, beaten and such you then assume this will happen again and the funny thing with humans, its always going to happen the same way again.

That is how funny the brain is, so I tell people who had such experiences, well the same thing, cant happen again exactly the same way unless you time travel.
This allows them to drop the trauma, just like that.

Its due how the comparison mode and logic works as this when understood and accepted basically allows the individual to understand that, and as that is true, the incident in our memory, changes.
The contextual causality stops.
People don’t run the memory again and feed-froward this to happen again.

One of my students, had taken clients, did well, she then started to create a business and charge the clients, and suddenly her first client she got stuck with, and as I asked her, what was going on, what became apparent was she now shifted context, added a belief, she would take another set of responsibility due to her now charging money.
So, same situation (context), she does the same job, but she now get stuck and the client don’t get results.

So, her belief when one charged money had a dragging effect on her same job.

Now, if that can happen, I guess if we reverse that as I wrote earlier, then the same will happen, and it does.

This is why RBIm not just give a tool to set a new fresh blueprint, but the NOTNLP protocol with comparison mode allows you to understand the structure of experience and reality.

It can take someone who cant play golf due to them slicing the ball and drop 20 shots from a 15 minute intervention.
It also can drop a trauma of a memory that has hunted one where the phobia and fear of bridges and other behavior has resulted and just be gone in 15 minutes, which was the way I discovered the NOTNLP process.

So, using RBIm we got two set of processes, one where we can directly use a somatic set blueprint, or a logical comparison mode NOTNLP protocol, that allows one to use two different approaches, depending on what context one is in.

Now, then the question opens up, what do I do with his then?
What do I use this for?

Well, that I leave to you to choose, consider and do.

I live my life, enjoying it, and yours is yours to live.

/Robert Johansson

Who cares, really?

posted in: Life, RBIm - 1 Comment

Who you are?

Well except you of course.
Must be a reason for that egocentric thing people often so likely display.

Awareness, is such a cool thing we become aware, of what is going on and we can actually wander or roam inside the contextual landscape that is our mind.
Now, some assume we can astro-project without our brain, good luck with that denial wankers.
Trying to think without our brain proving that we can exist without a psychical body shows some funny and silly remarks.

But we want to believe, we want that there is a mystery here,w e want to discover the initial spring of utopia or whatever.

I just a cynic here, its not that I don’t want mystery but as far I have worked and tried things I never found any mystical forces at work, no special ghosts, sure I found mystical experiences, especially for me unexplainable unless there is an explanation.

I often get questions as, why is this happening?

There is often as I uncover such then I find a plausible and true explanation that when I look on the internet, someone else haven’t found, and when I try to communicate this to someone who is in denial, the common response from NLP Trainers often refereed assholes.

Now, who we are, is something that springs from our brain development, its seldom any question you hear a lion ask, or a ping vine.
And as we become aware at age 4, we have developed two set of brains, that interact using comparison mode.
This allow us to either, stay in context identify with it, having a sense of timeless, and being able to be, within our own experience, and aware we have it as we enjoy having it, and this is doable and accomplished trough the RBIm technology.

Now, this comparison mode also allow us to stay out of context, to become what some calls disassociated. That isn’t true, we are always into a context somehow, just differently for each one.
Now, what I then propose goes against a lot of common used conceptual understanding of mind and behavior and the fun thing is, what I do works.
Its just easier.

I got a challenge coming up, a boy that has had a life as far that been interrupted by his school and his so called friends, and I be implementing the RBIm technology with him to rebuild a new reality.

Now, one might ask, who am I, the one asking the thing about the one I am?
This kind of questions run us in a loop, its called recursive consciousness and is doable for us due to our compression mode we have. Now, some as they talk about this, try to solve it using one brain mode, obviously this is why people for so many thousands of years have tried to solve the consciousness of man.

So, as I like to point out, seems I solve that.

I was one day many years ago sitting down waiting for a bus to arrive, and as I sat there, I did some NLP stuff as I always liked to do things and explore what did happen. Now, the one sitting there at that time, didn’t know what I know today, and obviously if that one I was back then, had knowledge of what I did today, he wouldn’t have understood either.

So, we ask, so is that memory I have, the one I am also and not?
It was most definitely one I was back then, not just anymore.
That doesn’t change I was there, sitting down waiting for the bus doing things.

However, I keep track of such, I don’t wander around, and as I don’t do that, I sit here writing this instead of walking out into the shiny great sun showing its light over the sky as I thought, I want to write this down now.
Its a choice.

Who you are, and who you wanna be, is a question of definition.

If you define it, I am always happy, then and you want that all the time, everywhere, that will interfere with people if you attend a funeral, people might shoot you since your not sincere.
That is why, we are always changing and moving trough time, and any one reality, any one context, wont ever happen, unless your truly ready to assume the idea that, this wont be accepted along the society you live in, and that is why some people go to live as a nun or a priest.

Time moves us, and as we assimilate new information we diverse and grow with that, so one day you realize, hey I cant do that anymore its not who I am.

You can simply check everything that you simply wont do in your life, that wouldn’t be who you are. That is one way one easily can verify what kind of person one is, and the answer will point one to, who one actually is.
Your using existing behavioral information to decide that.
Easy.

Now, asking oneself what is the experience of myself, being me?
Now as we ask such questions, people always and always and always access that source of information, all the time.

One good at adumbration the type of calibration taught in Mythoself will then have a obvious pattern to work and elicit just asking such question.
That is why people believe Joseph can do things in seconds and minutes but its misleading, he cant.
Oh, he want you to believe he can, but basically he cant.
Its called a self fulfilling prophecy.

So, since the awareness, the comparison mode allow us to become that, aware, of the duality, this created the idea of Christianity, that we are good and evil as we didn’t understand our own behavior…………………………………………………………….back in the dark ages.
No wonder, the myth of Jesus and such was created to try to solve the impossible at the time of the duality of mind.

People couldn’t understand their own behavior.
I met old people telling me straight up a ghost hide their bag, in their room. I told them, its called perceptual deletion a hypnotic phenomena that happens when the brain blocks out but she just told me straight up, no ti was a ghost.
For her, it was rational and made more sense it was a ghost.

Now, turn back 2000 years, when people didn’t have phones, no roads and couldn’t travel that far and there was no newspapers to talk about and people couldn’t tread. It is no strange diea people believed in mythological stuff as there was no explanation why a neighbor would kill his family, and so forth, then people assume the devil made him do it, the duality of mind.

I find as I grow older, that a lot of people want to believe and wont scrutiny the evidence and facts that either is there or not to support the claims.

Now today, we have a better tool and understandings due to NLP.
The stroke of what bandler and Grinder did, was to provide us with a way to understand why things work as they do and also, provide us with a scientific way to actually replicate and also to investigate what is going on , behavioral wise.

The logic of NLP is undeniable, and the evidence for such feats as astral projections and the likes, without any brain, is silly.

There is a ton of evidence I am right in this what I do and write, but that doesn’t mean people will like me or what I do as it demystify the thing people want to believe in.

One such thing was obvious yesterday, I met 4 people all that couldn’t understand why a boy could perform at home but not at school, and they even told me they was good doing what they do.
This is s situation that has escalated due to the school system has failed in the first place.
I have no issue understanding why the boy can do things at home and not at school.
For them, it was a mystery and also one where they tried to find a solution, and the mother just don’t want them to do investigations as this would face her and her son with the evidence of papers following him along in the school system alter on, and she is right, it will follow him.

So this is today at a school that should understand how people or kids do things but they even trained cant.

I posted and told people doing NLP things way back 10+ years ago, they couldn’t understand what I proposed as they couldn’t do it. What was more frightening, they didn’t wanna know or understand.
I also find it funny that people if they get better don’t wanna find out why.
If I get a treatment, and get better I ask around to find out why it works, if I meet people winning Olympic Gold medals, I ask them how they did it, that is a training I have had since a long time I always wanted to know how things worked, as it allows me to understand what I do and am better.

I also use this to invent, to create new things, I apply what I know to fields I like and enjoy so I test that and will find out if it works, and if not I investigate further.

So, I believe I might stumble upon why people who been great ball strikers in golf been like that, and its nothing like what anyone already published or teach. So, if it works, I can teach people to become great ball strikers.
Now, that is a hobby of mine to do such things.

I also wondered about this, who am I stuff for years, I used the knowledge from the comparison mode to test this out, to find out and test out who one was.
The answer is pretty obvious, but when one search its easy to stray of the path, believing anything.

The RBIm allows one as a model and technology to separate and sort, what a embodied experience is like, and a VAKOG (NLP) one is.
The difference is obvious for the one having it.

I don’t tell people attend a workshop telling them, well its your experience and then let that be as they do in Mythoself.

However, its something also that cant be told.

I had this student, done NLP for a decade or so, asking me, well how do I read faster?
My answer: read faster.
Now, I had to repeat that around 8 times or so before he got the message.
That is how much distortion that is going on in someones perception btw.

They believe they already know the answer is so they don’t hear the real answer.

The same is true about the RBIm technology being more and better than NLP, but the same perceptual phenomena occurs there, it will take a lot of time and people experience the RBIm technology and then I be admitted and accepted as the model that brought us beyond NLP and I get a noble prize.

Its like people telling me at a workshop, BUT this is what you write about?
Yes, exactly.

I did the NOTNLP protocol on stage, I did it step by step, proving you could do it live, make it work.
I also did every variation I could think of during the workshop to display the variety how the same structure is always there.
Now, I also elicited the position how one knows, live in the first demonstration I did, and that was something I haven’t even seen Joseph been able to do.
I asked him to do that back in 2004 in Mohonk, he failed.

Now, everything I write about is what I do on a workshop, eliciting a experience you want, might not be the answer I give you as the experience you end up might be different than you expect.

One guy asked me about motivation, I taught him the futurenow experience, having already done it, which created for him a serenity of peace, but he wanted to use drugs to skip his heritage his parents had him grow up with.
Finally he had what he always had dreamt about and then, he couldn’t understand how rare such a gift was to hold.
But, he couldn’t let it go.

One of the funny things I witnessed in Denmark back in 2003 was that even if Joseph was able to elicit the experience people didn’t know and understand what just had happen and they couldn’t hold onto it.
It was to much interference.

That is why the RBIm technology sets a clean blueprint in how the link between the somatic and cognitive awareness/focus/intention is set first.
This allow us to skip the GDS and such and do them later when the link is up so we understand, aha, this is how its like.

But then, who cares really about me what I do and what the world could gain from it?

/Robert Johansson

Doing Nothing

posted in: Life, RBIm - No Comments

One of the things done differently here is the way we can choose a experience.
Last night I though hum, was some time when I had a day of doing nothing.

So today, I had such a day.

Doing Nothing.

/Robert Johansson

Reality

posted in: Life, NLP, RBIm - 9 Comments

NLP is the study of the structure of subjective experience (reality).
Now, as they did that, NLP evolved using processes.

If one ask, what is the structure of my subjective reality or experience? to a NLP trainer, one might wonder what they will say.

Reality is contextual, it will be that no matter what we think abut it.
Context has a structure, it has walls, it has a floor, it has a roof, and when people move into space then up and down and such becomes, somewhat different then it becomes for astronauts a position of reference.
When we have gravity, our senses is done after that fact, moving out in space where we lack gravity, and the sense of up and down, we must adapt to where we are in “relation” to something.

So on Earth, we are in ways accustomed to our five senses, our spatial awareness, where we don’t need to relate other than to note where we constantly keep our balance using the visual system.
This allow us to stop using our internal reference system, the 3D positional system, as this becomes automatic until one loose ones sense of balance, which can happen due to pressure of height, or emotional reasons and such as balance is kept in relation to structure.

Now, that I never seen in any NLP books nor in any teachings or educations from famous NLP people.

How come the study of the structure of the subjective experience, isn’t talked about more or even defined?
That is what happens when we use the mind to create understanding about something else.
It allow us to evolve but also to limit ourselves by then starting to use the same model to understand the world.
Its like Robert Dilts using NLP to build more models from, using the filtering of NLP to build more well NLP?
Isn’t that backwards?

If one ask me, reality is a set structure of context, each individual have a set of references they use to define this structure, that if one shifts that definition, that move always shift their reality.

There is no need to do it like NLP does it nowadays using processes within the same contextual reality, if NLP truly was about the study if the subjective experience and its structure, they be doing what I do and teach today, period.
I can shift the structure of subjective experience, just like that.

NLP trainers and etc..cant.
Nor any variations of that, either it be new code NLP, DHE, NHR or such as meta-states.
None.

So, NLP or the people doing it obviously missed that boat somewhere.

Well, Roye Fraser didn’t, he found something he asked himself and went to explore stuff he had as experiences and had been watching in war, he used his knowledge from wars and his experience to ask himself about stuff he couldn’t explain. NLP didn’t have any answer there for him, he was however able to use NLP to uncover something so subtle, that people trying to model him, couldn’t get it.
One day, an apprentice of Roye watched him worked after years of study, and suddenly he was hit by this obvious observation seeing what Roye did that suddenly expanded his view to do it.
Such experiences one has, allows a combination of factors to occur, its a bringing two different set of context together for a fuller more enriched wisdom to occur where one simply, understands.

I got many who tried to get the Riggiomodel, from their point of reference from what they already knew.
And even when shown, where to be, and keep the reference point, this didn’t work that well due to people assume, how they run their experience, and the structure of it, assumes a particular position which by any means often is taught and kept from early ages without exceptions.
That position is the VAKOG, the representation systems.

If one are so used to use those, then by any means, to understand the structure of one does that will elude even the most astute observer.
Its like chasing ones own tail.
Yea, we all have a tail, its heritage from a previous much different history.

So, NLP use a model to track and map the mental map you use, then to add a resource to fix the issue so you can have what you want.
So, where is the structure of subjective experience then?

If one ask, let me think here,
if the individual shifts one structure that binds the reality, then one must assume that would be the structure of subjective experience, right?

So, I can do that using RBIm.
NLP cant.

Now, one can study the structure of subjective experience, and one can actually understands how it works.

My model, RBIm allows you to bypass any semantic or symbolic or references you learned over the years, meaning there is no resistance to use this as it is fully the structure of how you build new realities.
I can have someone as this lady did, seeking for 23 years after her experience, suddenly sitting there, having it.

And if you believe it was easy to do, it wasn’t.
Her fear was running high, pouring out adrenalin fully.
Her body was shaking that much she was basically pouring out, an impossible case to do a demonstration on live, right?
So addressing her wishes and desires, as she wanted something, and as she got that, she later was saying that it wasn’t it as it was something else, but she couldn’t, name it.
So, I sat there, until she could.

Information we have often isn’t categorized or set in a form that is explainable due to how its stored.

Anyhow, the fear she had, I addressed by this simple line using the NOTNLP protocol.
It works for kids age 4, it then will work for adults.

Fear, is the unknown quality where we lack, the reference.
If its unknown, people become afraid due to the brain reacts due to our history of being an ape and black, as it lacks a reference, this makes us lack a reason or comparison to our other brain post 4 years of age.
So, I had this kid, 4 years old, crying his heart our, afraid, as his dad was gone he became afraid, and as I addressed that, his fear just went away.
I had this lady becoming afraid during a session with her kids, and as she did, I asked her why and as she answered me, I said, cant happen again.

Now, as those both fears was gone I thought, there is no irrational fears.
Both had a traumatic reaction but it was all gone in a split second, just like that, at the time I just had NLP as a toolbox so I couldn’t understand why.
Today I can not just understand it, but work with it and also teach that approach as fear, isn’t irrational.

If one knows the structure of subjective experience, then one can change that, easily.
NLP don’t know, so they cant.

Now, what about contextual reality then.

We live in relation to stuff, gravity, Earth, and how the culture and social stuff is going on around us. This forms our brain, even when we are born if we get a C section, meaning the doctors cut the child out, some girls and ladies in civilized society doesn’t want their pussy to be bigger, so they ask the doctors to cut their baby out to keep their pussy in working condition, however studies have shown, babies that is born the natural way have a better immune system than those that gets a c-section.
Its due to the DNA and the brain activates due to the stress of birth is needed to prepare the kid for the world the best way possible. Birth is the preparation for being prepared.

So, as we interact with our environment, we form the bond to activate our neurology to that.
Meaning, its contextual.

Now, logic also states we can separate ourselves from the environment, but our understanding is still from the environment or context.
This is why girls who been heartsick seldom seeks out new love, as they now understand boys to basically just drop them as a hot stone and disappoint them. So by removing themselves from the context, they still however understand the world from that context.

Building a future experience allows us to basically create a new subjective structure out of the box, just like that.
Instead of exploring or mapping current ongoing mental map as NLP does, we skip that reality, we just create a new one as we humans have learn to do as we grow up.

Every reality is contextual set, meaning each time people have a problem, its contain within specific structural formats which are contextual, its been assumed as NLP does it we need to alter the submodalites, using hypnosis and such to alter the ongoing reality.
Using a process ie NLP technique to do so based upon the replication (modeling) people who did change work worked.

No one asked, hey guys, what if what those people do and what people maybe do isn’t the best option here?

When we move us into a contextual future experience, this is set and separate from our current one, allowing us to set it, free from previous references.
Its like getting a witness protection program, where one get a new identity.

In different guru systems as OSHO etc..the idea is to give the individual a new name to remove them from previous life, that doesn’t work that well. Its done without understanding human nature and brains and neurology and can create more problems than it solves.

Going to the future, allowing a set structure of reality to be there, allows us to re-build or re-set the current ongoing experience we experience the world trough.

Just like that.

As I been teaching my aim has always been to make sure people could do things I wanted them to, whoever that task was more of a challenge than I ever could imagine, no NLP could or no testing I did allowed me to create the level of interaction I wanted as I wanted.
I was good, but that aside, I wanted my students to be better.

So, I knew I had to find a better way, and that allowed me to keep on going to find better ways and the so called unconscious teaching model used by NLP trainers isn’t it.
It seemed strange to me, that anyone would use unconscious stuff where none knew what they was taught and how it worked and then accept that without actually know how things worked?

So,a s things progress, the idea of a set blueprint or a taught this is the distinction you need to have was born.
Getting that, set a reference for oneself, this allows the individual to have a first experience where they have a know how, aha, this is how its like, having it like this, without concerning oneself with, am I at my best state and experience, am I living the mythical of my self, or why cant I do it now when I could at the class?

So, my education now have gone to teach basically a repetition to set the RBIm first step and to get that distinction down.
Doing that and then access a future experience, allows one to gain a free and direct access to the emotional desires one have.

This approach allows one to understand and know what it is, before one attempts to set and re-set the future experience.
Doing it this way, allows one to access and set the embodied balanced combination between the major brain developments, to understand which one is vestibular and which one that is VAKOG.
Basically this allows one to experience, reality, different even if its the same as its due to one set of reference.

One benefit with this, as its done as it is,w e also gain the refresh each time it is set, so every time its accessed and positioned, its new.
The generalization of the quality of beauty.

Every time we experience, beauty, its like that each time and still it never cease to be, beautiful for us. Using NLP we cant model that, as the model is about study the structure subjective experience, NOT doing it.
That is why even the co-founder do drugs, and behave as he still is in his younger age as he haven’t been able to move on in spite of his NLP development.

Now letting go is another hot potato but I wont go into that this time, it long enough post as it is.

Reality is contextual.
What NLP tried to do was to use a process to shift the current reality, based upon study of excellent therapeutic workers, and the study if people shifting the phobia on their own etc..

But what if we just build a new reality a future based, and let people sit there, having a new kind of experience, what then happens to what was?

It simply stop to exist.

Just like that.

In time-travel, one cant occupy the same space as its own past self.
But since we cant time travel and the reality cant be changed what has happen, all that is a trick of the mind being able to do all those.

But the world we know, never cant do that.

Just our mind but that is mind-blowing by itself

In the beauty I stand perfect.
So shall you

/Robert Johansson

Somatic doing it how many times?

posted in: FAQ, RBIm - 2 Comments

When one does access the different what we perceive how reality is performed from a more embodied approach, we combine the functions we developed during the years where we can choose to identify with the context and be the same within this context.

Now, how do one choose to do it and what would be the effects?

If one lives life within one set of parameter, life will be really different than most people perceive it, as for example, if your always been happy and cheerful and never bogged down, you cant understand why people complain or think life sucks.
For people who has such experience of life, then life is always, well happy.
The fun thing there are such people out there, not many obviously, but then some.

As you learn to access a embodied form, where your brain is combining, the major developments, your able to perceive, life differently, obviously.

I taught this access where your at the best to a triathlon girl, now as she went and took a one hour swim, she held that access point the whole time, obviously, she got a headache of the concentration required.

My simple rule, if your not within the experience wanted, then you access and set it again.
Now, is this anchoring?

No, this is when your focus your attention to the position your have the information stored to be in a particular experience. Having this kind of experience, is different from what people normally have, suddenly they have this sense of wonder for some, its just great in their quality of interaction suddenly starts to skyrock.
For some I guess they might become high due to the new set of perceptions they suddenly have access to.
Mostly tho, people just don’t think about it much as they are, inside the context, identified with it, so there is no need to think about it much.

For someone new, doing this, then this might involve several days to do it as what mostly happen is they loose the experience.
This happens a lot, as a state of experience seldom is stable due to our contextual anchoring that occurs a lot.
When one has a embodied access, what happens is that one can in real time, notice this and simply let it be.
I got a lot of people who complains around me, some are students I have some are other people, and I look at them and think, why do they complain so much?

So, can you always be in the experience you want?
Yes.
Its a choice.

I note some who gone trough the Mythoself program have issues getting it going after the class, and its no wonder, as the elicitation process, used with NLP and hypnosis, isn’t that good to teach people and use to teach them the structural format to be, as they are, like this.
That is due, that, if we take where people don’t have problems as they stop to exist, this doesn’t take into consideration the most important factor of all, integration between the pre age 4 and post age 4 dominant brain formations and evolutions.
When Mythoself works, it does just that but since the focus is a lot on the language and linguistics, it just plain sucks to get it right directly.
When one do the embodied form, one also create a reference between a VAKOG oriented way and a vestibular way.
The setup in RBIm allows a set blueprint, in a short direct way, this is how its like, when it is like this.
Now, when one then access a future based experience one seeks to have, one automatically now have a balanced way to know how this is like, without ever done this before, free from the so called semantic need to understand and do.
Its like trying out new outfit, one knows what it should be like wearing it, and when one try them on, and look at them, one choose the dress one wants based upon what one would like to wear.
Due to one knows how it is like to wear cloths.

So, set blueprint experience, access future experience, set and find the point of where this position is held, holding that position allows one to be, as this like this.
So, one knows where this is located due to having a set free blueprinted experience first, to get a feel of how its like, allows one to make a transition to another embodied experience much easier.

I wont say it doesn’t have challenges, it has, as one now become aware of the experience they now have, is a choice fully.

You cant be sad, or happy, or angry, unless you so choose.

I always test things myself, and before the workshop, I run twice a day the somatic access point, for 3 months before the workshop.
I just didn’t add any extra, just did the RBIm first thing, the somatic set access combining pre age 4 and post age 4 for 3 months twice a day.
Morning and evening.

This allowed me to categorize and sort our relevant information regarding the model of RBIm, the embodied and the VAKOG in a way that let me find out what the difference are in my perceived field.

Now, one might ask as the assholes of NLP Trainers as Gabe Guerrero might say, dude, if you did the NLP unconscious installation it wouldn’t take 3 months, it takes minutes…You be doing it unconsciously, dude.

Well NLP cant do this, at all, due to the NLP technology don’t cover embodied experience.
Now the ass holes the NLP trainers, don’t know what to think so they spew out some metaphorical tale and run with their tail to bandler and complain.

If NLP could do this, I wouldn’t tell you to do RBIm.
But that method cant do it.

And the fun thing here is, when you do RBIm, you don’t need to do NLP.
You understand that one day.

I do things like that, run things for months to simply repeat the basic structure, which if you listen to any Martial arts old dude, the basic is where the practice should be.
When ever I do Kali or such, I do basic stuff, and I repeat that until I can really do it.
The reason is, it has to be fully integrated into your behavior, if your doing it and since I am a do first kinda guy, I test this so I then can show people the difference much easier.

When one has this embodied experience, the access allows one to have it, and its never gets old, it never finds this Plataea, if you access being happy for example, or at your best, you can always do it, and it never ever gets old or boring as each time you access it, its new.

Now, you cant do that with NLP, its IMPOSSIBLE for them, Bandler cant do it, nor Grinder, nor Dilts NO ONE IN NLP.

For them if they set that, the human neurology will sooner or later reach a level where the firing of neurons will slip away and the signal is weaken. Its like drugs, the first time you did them, you became high and felt good, and had a great experience, now trying to get that experience back using the same drugs wont work.
But since the mind try to get the feeling or experience back, we just use what we believe will make it work, even if it doesn’t.
That is hope, the one causality structure that might ruin it for people, the hope this time it will work in spite of the evidence it doesn’t.

So, I teach people faith, here is this thing, if you do it, you can always set it to be for example, happy, and you will never run out of that ever.
Now, hope dosnt work then, it is then a question of faith.
Never?
Nope.
Ever?
Nope.

How is that possible and why isn’t anyone else teaching that?

You got me there.

Each time I write, its new for me.
I done this for over a decade, its always new, ever time.
Every time I have a client, its new, every time I do a workshop, its new.
I don’t need to do it as Robert Dilts does, re-set and re-fresh it for a seminar.
He use a VAKOG a NLP based way to experience life, and if you ask me, that is limited.

People also note when I do things there is this quality of simple.
Now, since some often think they need understanding before doing, I ask what they need to understand before they do.

Well if I am going to be at my best, playing golf for example, what would that mean?
Well, you hit every shot exactly where you aim it, every time.
Well, what do you mean by that?
Well, then I repeat the above until the individual, gets it.

When the position is known of the experience, all one does is to set up and do the same position each time.
A golfer named Moe Norman, did learn to do that without being able to tell people how he actually did things.
I today have a tool that will allow me to teach you how to access the embodied experience, teaching you how its like before you access any other experiences, allowing you to explore this how its like, a test drive if you like before you do it with your life in general.

This is due to your position is held within a balance of a pre age 4 and a post age 4 brain evolvement.
This don’t involve language, as that is symbolic and structural, and one more reason why kids don’t get, the NOT do it.

So, for me writing, is automatic, I don’t need to access this experience as it is already set with my writing.
Doing client work is automatic, doing workshops are automatic.

If I want to do new things, as I worked on developing a golf teaching model, I apply this to my golf.
If I am right, I be able to identify the distinction which is the position held, doing it in a particular way, the same each and every time I do it.
I propose the idea of muscle-memory is a myth.
If it wasn’t then people wouldn’t be able to shift motion when they perform.

So, my approach in RBIm is basically the same as a Martial arts.
1.learn the basic move and identify the distinction. Repeat that until it can be done habitually.
2.then access any experience wanted, note the particulars about that position.

Obviously, I spent 3 months doing the 1 step.
When I did that, this allowed me to build a reference base, in how to calibrate and how to notice this and how it works.
This meant I now can calibrate the same way Roye Fraser could and what Joseph Riggio does.
What is more important, I can teach people calibrate like them much easier as I identified what makes that to happen.

Think about this as, doing one thing at the time.
You don’t think about what your doing next, until you done the thing you do, done.
Now, even if it isn’t exactly like that at least it gives an idea how its like.

So, how often one does this is different, some do this based upon the context and choose different set for the task at hand, and then some do one all around all the time.

But if you ask me, most would do a combination of both.

The triathlon girl just swim, run and use her bike.
Its context specific for her.
Sports tend to be like that

/Robert Johansson

Timetravel

posted in: Life, RBIm - 2 Comments

Reality today is much different than it was 50 years ago.

When we are in a technological era we get gadgets that makes things easier. Back in 1980 around 1200 people worked the mines in Kiruna, today its like 150 or less and shrinking and today the mine produce more ore than it did 1980.

Now, external events are easier to understand than internal in how our mind works.

One might ask me, so if I do this RBIm, then what would be the difference for me?

You be moving your experience and perception to a vestibular access meaning, you be having a body oriented experience of your life vs the causality based one your most likely currently is having.
The RBIm allows us to re-shape reality as what we have experienced, don’t mean we are trapped into what has been true for us.
This allow us to experience or perceive the external world differently, as the events no longer means the same for us.
Once I was a sport fanatic, I watched a lot of sports, today, I seldom even lift an eyebrow when sports are shown.

When we shift to a more body we shift our attention inwards which allow us to track in real time our own experience as we are having it, this is a shift in perceptual reality, which is what happens when we have our own experience.
This inward attention keeps or locks our position in how we set the sensory array the VAKOg and we can then wander around, within that internal experience, and then experience the world from that experience and obviously, this is different than most people ever had.

How is it like winning a Olympic medal, how is it like working with someone and they suddenly release decades of stress?

Its like saying, you had to be there.

Using time lines as NLP does only shifts peoples VAKOg events, and if done properly, the position might shift along the way but it is a complicated and also, basically still set the VAKOg or causality as the major way to experience reality, and basically it also often extends that making it worse.

Now, I know its kinda cool to explore stuff that happens in our minds, to adjust something, so a shift happens, and most never realize we are always shifting our experience, however, most keep going believing they always have the same experience when they are not.
Then, to say as I do, but isn’t that the same as you teach then?

No, what I teach allows you to differentiate when the one or the other is running.

Either your running your experience, or the experience is running you.

That is where Intention comes handy, we can by focus our awareness, shift our span of attention towards something else, and this allows us to re-direct our own experience in real time.
Its like having one set of experience, and suddenly, just shift focus, and go into this other experience, just by being attentive.

Its not about changing one experience, add resources to it, and smack it hard and integrate it, no, here we just simply shift our attention point, towards a future experience, allowing our body to perform its duty.

I ask people doing sports, how is it like doing this thing, and already done it?
They go, what?
I say,w ell you when your doing this does it like that and how is it like having already done that for you?
When they have that, in experience, and keep the same position inwards attentive, running this they are able to experience the nirvana of sports.

The ultimate experience, enjoying the thing you do and doing it in flow, perfect or in the way you like it.

Its like going into the higher levels of mind, the same one people want to experience what they do and still be doing it.
This is the level of performance the very best athletes get when they are doing the zone.
However, this also means they are loosing themselves in the process as who we are isn’t there then.

Jan-Ove Waldner was in his last Olympic start, doing and playing a game that was extraordinary at his age, and he won and as he did that, he woke up and this can be seen on camera after the match-ball is done, he stated after, he didn’t know where he was, and also who he was playing like that. In the next game, he couldn’t repeat that level of performance and lost.

Now, when we fully identify with the context, we also tend to loose the concept of self as this isn’t hold as it once was, its a new set of context guiding us, the ball, the external contextual parameters, and this is the same as the demonic states John Grinder and De Lozier investigated where the performance we do, we transcend our experience to be, one with the performance.
Now, many never learn to do this, as NLP is somewhat not able to teach people to do so safely.

The idea of our self, being something tied to our soul or body or somewhat else often limit our performance, as there is no such as all we are is tied to what we attach to it.
I tell people I coach, if you want it, you can be the nr1 in the world in your sport.
Requires hard work, and dedication but its there in their experience if they so choose.

When we are able to enter such experience where we suddenly are able to transcend our experience of what we are or who we are, suddenly people understand.
What most wants to do is to keep the one self they once did learn to be, and then to believe its like this due to my previous experience, this is, who I am now.

So, I get this girl coming to see me, after 2 years of therapy she is basically a mess.
So I ask her, who she was, and as she searched fort he answer which took around 12 hours for her.
Until then, I waited until she could give me an answer, and she was scarred, unhappy, badly self confidence no trust in herself basically she wasn’t worth anything.
Now, as soon she could give me an answer, all her problems went away.
Much to her and her boyfriends surprise.

Suddenly she wasn’t bound and tied to her past experience, she was free.

As I did in the November workshop, so what is your best day like I asked?
Obvious, the first response was, like this and I asked, is it based upon what has been your best day or a day that might come from the future being an even better day?

Naturally it was noted, it was a causality based upon past to present reference.
So I said, what if you just had a future only reference of your best day ever?
Now, as she did that, suddenly she understood the difference, between past experience and defining life from the past to the future instead of using the future to present.
I then elicited her own way to know its like this, and she could then keep this position and as she accessed her experience, it was all new every time.
The same but new.

You wish your sex life was like that everyday right?

Now, she went from a NLP, VAKOG or representation way to understand her world, to a internal inward vestibular experience, and this shifted everything she once believed to be true about stuff.
Its hard to understand this without the proper experience, as this is the level when people get how the phrase let go fits in, its like this idea people can just let go of a past memory or past experience, they cant.
It doesn’t compute for them as they are told to let it go.

Now, as she had this kind of experience, and note it works, she now has control over how she will react to external events, based either upon her own internal experience or not.
Then, she can choose and decide, is this the experience I want to have, and if not, shift, just like that.

Its the shift of our decision point, now in NLP its called the T.O.T.E and there is a added idea where the way people use information and then creates a decision point.

Now, normally people use a past reference (memory) to decide what the future the upcoming task will be like and evaluated against the past reference.
This is what people do that are afraid, they take the task they are going to do, and then based upon past often a bad experience, they link this to a task they never have done, and then feel bad about it in advance, even before they done it….

When I am about to do something I always think its easy either I done it before or going to do a new thing.

Now, this create a experience, about an experience we haven’t done yet and people often ask me, I cant do that future experience thingy as I am never sure about the future.
I haven’t ever done that before.
I go, you do it now.

To ask the question, I cant do it, imply they have done it, in their mind and then decided, they cant do it.
Ah, note I can use NLP really well if needed to explain the causality of human beings.

So, I teach people to do one thing differently, time travel to a future experience and decide in advance how good it will be and then set that as the new reference point, before doing a task.
Now, doing that, using VAKOG as they do in NLP doesn’t work.

You need to use a embodied approach as RBIm does it.
Then it will be easier and also safer.

You be aware of the difference, as I did the workshop, I commented, and asked people about their experience they had, and they didn’t need to leave it, and let it go, they could still do it even when talking about it.
That is due to when one knows how one holds or keeps the position then its like this.
One could say its ones own internal anchor, however, its more than that, as it is working even when one would be depressed where the NLP anchoring would fail, this then would work.
Little is known about the vestibular system, its one of the system that holds balance but also have other functions not known at current time.

We learn to orient us after how we perceive the world trough our five senses, we create time and the track of time trough those, creating a sense of start and ending.
When one does that, we also to a degree robs ourselves of some other particular interesting experiences, where one can stay within one, being one, with the environment or context.

This kind of experience, is not supported in the society most live in today, its do this now or rather yesterday.
Then learning to support the post 4 years of age where this becomes the dominant way we experience our surroundings, its also creates the ex-tense of habit to believe and think the world is, causality based.
When one have this kind of experience, one absolutely know the difference, and what many cant understand, if its so great why don’t people always stay in it?

Some do.

I have done change-work for 15+ years and done trainings for 10+ and for me, the same experience is always there when I work.
In that context, it never changes, its just great.

Now, obviously we can do that but also, what kind of experience would we like to be running constantly if we had a choice?

Timelines in all respect, but removing people from the experience seems a troublesome way to make people more dead than alive if u ask me.

One benefit of running such experiences from a future point reference, are that we can judge the action we are about to do based upon previous failed experience, and if we use sports as an example, maybe you make a huge mistake, and then you just don’t dwell on it, you just shift gear into keeping track of your future one, and the mistake basically never happen and cant influence your next action.

Now, if you believe the future isn’t real I got news for you, the future is as real as your current past, as your past basically is just a remembered event, that differs from the future on one single variable, that you actually did the things you did remember. However, many scientific research points that our memory is filled with gaps, and we constantly are updating those based upon associations, so what we remember, are changing even when we believe its always the same.

Now, as we are seldom aware of that as our current consciousness and awareness as it is, how can it be different?
It cant.
As it is, it is.

Then the comparison mode kicks in and we suddenly become aware of the context we are within.
This allow us to either shift experience to a better one or enter a worse one.

I have talked to sports people, and told them, when they try to explain to me what the problem is, and I say, well lets assume for a moment the following, I want you to demonstrate for me this perfect move in their sport.
Now, obviously they will try tell me, they cant do that, obviously as they have a problem.
So, I continue, well I understand that but do what I ask you first then we talk.

So, in a moment, they go like they can just do, what they just couldn’t do, just like that.
They look at me as I did some magic.

I go, what?

This is impossible!

It is? I say.

Yes, this isn’t possible!

So, I witness something that is both impossible and possible?

Yes!

Aha.

People have beliefs and assumptions about what is doable based upon previous past reference and since everyone is telling them it cant be done, then it cant be done. I just use a future reference where it is done, and then its doable, obviously…

That is why I love what Oliver did, talking to a lady who shots 100 in golf is like a real amateur, then to go to 80 shots after a 15 minute talk is like, impossible for the pga golf trainers, its not doable for them. You just cant drop 20 shots like that, its not possible.

Its like the Hank Haney Project with the basketball guy, who couldn’t swing, he failed with him to improve his swing playing the game, and its due to them lacking tools of how the mind and body functions doing athletic performance.

Now, as soon we use the future experience, that haven’t happen yet, but as we access it, set the criteria what the quality of our experience should be like for us, say, perfect or flow, or in the zone, as we then establish that, we have that experience, untainted and new and fresh every time like this as we taught ourselves this is the experience I want to have to perceive this thing I do.

Growing up, people around you teach you how to be and your formed from that a lot, now, there is a opportunity to cast those shackles loose, to uncover what is doable, possible and impossible and having fun doing it.

You set new contextual variables, attach new set of experience to the context, and then you can create basically just about any experience, and then, find out what its like having such experiences.

Come timetravel with me.

/Robert Johansson

Understanding linguistic conceptual minds

posted in: RBIm - No Comments

When we interact with the world, we do so by affirming to understand what is going on, however most of what we do, we don’t understand, we just use it and do it.

We use concepts to categorize how we understand, one such is to us a comparison of analogy,
we use a similar situation to understand something else, there is a number of such different ways we do it, when a mother tries to explain why its kid cant eat candy, the mother would use an analogy to say its bad, often using some kind of similarity the kid can understand.

The analogy is used to explain what it is like to the level of understanding the individual holds at the moment of the subject.

Now, the danger is when we don’t examine that subject if the analogy is correct.

Richard Bandler often states stuff as, people come and tell me they really is unsure of themselves and are sure about it.
Now, we can either check what Richard means by that or just take his word for it, what would you do?
I would check his word, as he often lies and try to confuse the reader a lot.

Analogy is when we get a comparison of a process made that we already knows how it works, this is done in acupuncture also, the advanced concepts in acupuncture how energy flows in the body are taught in simple metaphorical ways, the mother-son meridians, the brother-sister meridians, the time meridian and so on, its concepts people in the Chinese country would understand easily.
So the practitioner would be able to do acupu8ncture using the analogy of relationships in a family.

Obviously they wouldn’t be able to explain, why it worked, just that its done this way then it works.
The assholes of modern medicine looked at acupuncture as silly assholes as they believed it was a plain and silly medicine system due to the family metaphors.
They didn’t understand acupuncture and couldn’t get it and still don’t get it.

I got more help from acupuncture and such methods than I got from the doctors in the hospital.
I got more help with my back from acupuncture and chiropractic..

Now, that isn’t to say that modern medicine is good but it so much lack personal social skills.
The way the Chinese diagnose is much better than modern doctors use, and they downplays acupuncture and Chinese doctors?

I got a good deal of respect for those barefoot acupuncture doctors.
At least they know what they are doing.

However I digress.

A concept is used when we don’t understand how something works.
Now, when that concept is used without anyone actually checking if its true or not, its get so ingrained into the daily use people believe its a fact, and true, and then sooner or later when someone comes along and explains it isn’t like that, people don’t believe it.

The atom we did learn once isn’t built like that, its a model in how we understand how the atom behaves.
As we cant see, the atom or electrons in detail, we create an analogy to describe its behavioral output.

This model or concept then becomes the norm, the way we understand the atom and how it behaves, and if its true enough the model becomes commonly used.
Now, people added quantum scale to this, we then have another deeper issue with the Universe.

Back in Freud’s days, they didn’t know why people behaved as they did, they assumed it was unconscious that was the name they came up with, the subconscious and so on to describe why people become sick mentally and couldn’t be cured trough talks.

So, methods or interventions or techniques was developed to handle this unknown unconscious.
Since, if the individual wanted to change wanted to feel good, but couldn’t obviously, then the unconscious mind must control it?

So, then it was assumed using hypnosis would help contact this unconscious mind, and make the individual change as they wanted to change.
Now, Freud didn’t have data to understand why brains did as they did, nor had Bandler nor Grinder when they co-created NLP not Bandler singlehandedly as it has been on some websites.
He was the one who took the initiative but he alone did create NLP? Come on even a kid understands that isn’t true.

So NLP did model or replicate what people did, and then built replicas, its like this idea if people did really well,w e could replicate that and teach people to do it as same and get the same result.
Now, that works well but it isn’t innovative.

In that this also create unwanted conceptual understandings that people have in NLP.
Now, I tell NLP trainers this, and they don’t believe me due to them being brainwashed a lot.

Its easy and commonly accepted to just believe what you read in books or what Bandler or Grinder talks about in tapes or videos, but if you check what they teach and states, it don’t match up.
Now, most never do that, they just assume and accept if you get a result that doesn’t match the commonly believed they delete that, its like it was a bad mistake, strange but hey, Bandler said it was like this so it most be, yes?

So, I got mismatched result, so I went and checked, and told trainers that and they denied it….
So, I started to dig deeper.

As the modeling I did of Joseph Riggio and the subsequent experience allowed me to formalize why people don’t need NLP anymore, its to old to archaic and so slow to use as it isn’t innovative, its just replicating.

So, I got this new blueprint set up that allows people to do things based upon the same principles people in china got to learn when becoming a barefoot doctor of acupuncture, they got these concepts they used to diagnose and apply acupuncture.
They didn’t need to know why this needle did, it just knew, if I balance the mother-son meridian, or the time meridian, this illness goes away.
Easy system, works well.

Now, RBIm allows you to do this psychical move, then to use the focus of attention to that and to identify a distinction which if you do,a re able to do what Roye Fraser once did, in minutes.
Now, I have done something Steve Andreas and Connirae Andreas never succeed with, something bandler never could understand.
Roye was a student of Bandler and I bet he told him what he did and Bandler never got it or if he did, he have done a good job hiding it. Roye and Joseph once attended one of bandlers workshops, they never did what Bandler taught, a way to demonstrate to bandler, hey dude, your wrong man, and people slowly but steady was drawn to what Roye and Joseph did, it was evident it was better than what bandler did teach.

Now, without knowing the whole background it seems to me as a demonstration of directions, don’t do this bandler, please do this, its much more well elegant.
He obviously didn’t listen.
I can understand why though.

Now, as a concept is used to make it able to be used, we then can assume, some linguistic or conceptual descriptions don’t cut it, and that is why I have taken out the language as much as I can, there is no need to elicit already established positions as GDS etc…as those just makes it harder to learn to do it.
Now, obviously people will ask, why should I do this move and why should I focus on that and why should I identify this distinction?

And I go, because I tell you to, I know – you don’t.

That is the difference between someone who actually have the experience but also the knowledge to understand what goes on.
When I don’t, I tell people that straight up, never had any issues not knowing stuff in front of people.

Now, I do use such approach not because I want to make people stupid or feel stupid or such, I do so by removing the need to explain as even if I do explain, it doesn’t help.
Its like some want to watch me work, and I go, why do you want to see me on video?
Well so I can learn what you do?

No, you cant I say.

I then ask them for their evidence they want to have, the experience it is, and when they have it what they can do.
Like Louis, he wanted a video, so he could get it, and as I asked him, he didn’t need to see it, as he already knew it.

Now, as the individual knows learn to do RBIm without knowing why before they do it, they don’t have any pre-conceptual ideas that can interfere.
When they have the experience, this is then evident and obvious.
Then they get it.

They now have the evidence, in experience, which allows them to understand and get it why they should do it this way.
I had people telling me in November at the workshop, hey this is what you write about?
Yes, its all here in my blog what I do.
There is no secrets, its better than NLP by amount of simplicity.

The RBIm technology teaches how to separate and categorize experience by body and by VAKOG.
And how to combine those to the best balanced experience possible based upon the individuals own wishes.

Now, this is done by skipping the explanation why we do it this way, we get the experience in how its like having a embodied wholeform experience, without dragging unneeded linguistic or VAKOG or representations to this.

Just ask Oliver about that.

He been reading the blog, but the difference in experience was, well WOW!

Your combining higher brain functions with the body and how they work in union or balance and then add the wishes and desires you have, guess what?
Its a powerful as hell approach.

It doesn’t mean people can do it all after one trial as this messes big time with how people assume reality works and is created for them.
Its not easy tot ell people who have trauma its gonna be gone before they do it, and when they done it, its like they never had the trauma, its like we are wiping the whole way we set reality here, that we no longer are bearers of our ancestors our past, we are truly innovative evolutionary in this approach.

Doing that without any need for unconscious mind, hypnosis, language patterns, concepts of what it is, allows true enjoyable action.

Now, its commonly believed we are the heritage of our ancestors, our behavioral output is the same as it been for 3 generations back, if you check your grandparents, you have behaviors they had.
I met those around me, and its true, I got behaviors they have, and I never intended to have those.

That is what kids do, learn how to respond to their external social cultural upbringing.

This also builds conceptual understanding, can be learned before experience.
It cant.

It become theory without experience.
Its like the first moonlanding, as it was never tested, they used math to understand how it should work, but before they did it, no one had done it.
It might been a situation where those guys that landed would never have gone back, they still be there, watching at us.

Maybe then, the people having conspiracy theories that NASA never went to the moon might go away. They could look up and see dead people looking back.

That is why conspiracy theoretic people are so silly, they are doing theory, not having the experience.

Concepts, are used to map across different subjects as an analogy does, that allows us to map the progression that is going on from another related field, this is what happens when we grow up, we use those people around us as role models, and then we use those approaches to understand the world, when those don’t work, we change or deny.

Then words as unconscious mind is used, without anyone define it in experience, and if we replace that as I have done, people suddenly get there is no unconscious mind in there.
Still got students who haven’t understand that concept.
Its kinda easy when you get it tho.

Since it goes across everything people been believed to be true, as its commonly again useable not just in NLP, people cant innovate since they are basically blocking out their own perceptions without knowing they do.

When we examine and test the assumptions, we can assume to a degree that the unconscious mind don’t exist and it much better without one.

Using RBIm we don’t need one.

Kinda cool.

Its a Noble prize for me one day.

The difference between ontology and epistomology are due to the difference in pre 4 and post 4 years of age.
Doing it that way, its much easier to understand there is no need for those concepts or words.
You can track ontology to the pre 4 age phase, and has nothing to do with the beliefs Joseph has about that.
Due to them belong in the epistomology and post 4 year of age.
That is why some even belive he use precise language and I dont.

Conceptual linguistics are really easy to get confused and belive its acurate when they aint.

Now, RBIm is kinda easy as a concept to do and to use, and to understand how it works isnt that hard.
When one has the experience, doing it, not reading about it

/Robert Johansson