Ever seen people or met them and found out how charismatic they was?
Now, its doable to replicate such feat for yourself even when you might believe it isn’t possible.
Charisma, isn’t anything we are born with, its something we do, its due to the nature of how the brain established a continuity of state.
Charisma is learnable by the nature of continuity or the ability to have a state ongoing for a longer period of time, now most people shift state each time the thoughts they have, shifts.
Experience of producing contingency in your own experience is what is really hard to do using NLP as its source is anchoring.
You “anchor” and then, fire of the anchor, and now suddenly you will have the state, and I tell you, that don’t work at all.
I seen NLP trainers teach that approach for years and it doesn’t work.
If the anchor is set, in a particular way, it will work, but then its not anchoring taught within NLP.
Let say, you skip the VAKOG, the pillars of NLP and then what do you got then?
RBIM.
The how to, access and stabilize such experiences, using the combination of knowing what the brain has built for structures to held up a particular experience, over time.
I told you this before, that the age up to around 4 is predominated by simple yet powerful attachment to context, and this allows us to become and identify with what we relate to in our environment. And as this is going on a second installment is developed the way we make comparisons, and as we get there we often loose the structure in how to identify, without making serious clashes with the reality people built from comparisons.
As kids get that they get bored easily, and suddenly, going outside for an hour is like ww3, where they one day could be out for a whole day and never eat, never do anything else than being outside, and now suddenly they need motivation???
I meet adults, that tells me they cant be motivated to do things and I go, lost the childhood huh?
They go, huh?
I said, lost the childhood?
Often I got to explain that, and tell them about how to access the future experience, being there in advance and suddenly they don’t need to be motivated anymore, they just have new behaviors suddenly, out of nowhere…
The NLP so called propulsion system that bandler teach is old archeology and not needed as it is artificial in its construction.
Its also problem oriented as his work is in spite of what he tells people.
The one thing I didn’t know long time ago was that people already had this pre age 4 stuff in their system and how to notice it and observe it, and now as I know how it works, its often really easy to show the client how to establish for example charisma.
Most people seldom have the same experience over a longer period of time due to them never been taught to do that or lack the practice.
I told a triathlon athlete this, and she access her best experience doing her best, and as she did this, she did it to such a degree, over a race that lasted 2 hours without any issues at all, straight out of the box.
This is why I like athletics and work with them and business people who seeks success or wants even bigger success, its much easier to get them going and doing this, as they just do things, they don’t need a lot of instructions, they go, so I do this and then measure it like this and check this and then I do whatever I do?
I go, yea..and they go, ok cool.
Then I get feedback, in how it did work and I tell you, if I teach stuff that doesn’t work, o boy, people are fast to tell you that.
I got this guy playing golf, and everything he been taught for 15+ years was how things didn’t work out, so I taught him stuff that all did work, and then he still refuse to believe he did things that he did that actually worked, and that never failed him.
If you have such looser or failure systems, one of the things does systems creates are doubt.
Its due to the experience people get over time, they expect to fail sooner or later, as they have learned that Is what they do have learned.
So, naturally, everything I did, and taught worked, and obviously, since this worked, he went on and tried to make it to NOT work.
This is due to how the brain understands reality, if this is done as it has been for many, people cant believe for example that RBIm is better and more efficient and more fun than NLP and also easier to learn and that Bandler and Grinders work now is continued from this dude in Sweden, and they do anything to find out how it isn’t like that, and guess what, they will all fail doing that.
And I be smiling.
The failure, creates a position where the comparison people make, is done due to its logical conclusion, I haven’t got this result no matter what I tried, so even if I do get it now, it cant be due to (beliefs) this reason…
This creates a deletion and distortion and generalize to the perception so people cant trust their one result they just had, and as this happen, they cant be consistent, having the same experience, over time.
This also applies to charisma, anyone can have it, its due to how one is able to consistently, be consistent producing the same experience, over time.
Ever met, Dali lama etc..?
Such people do that experience they generate for years and years.
This then become who they are, which basically is what reincarnation is, an attempt to find kids that are sensitive to pick up the cues the people and why are all the Dali lamas from Tibet?
No one from Canada?
As we might go from our own causality way if living to a more being here kind of experience, then life also take another shift.
So, I once did this job for a kid but since I had one week to do it, I spent the whole week in excellence, and the people working there all got better at their work, just from being in the same presence as me.
I had the same experience, so as mirror neurons fire off, the people working there had to access their own version of it.
I wasn’t paid to do that but I find it a good way as any to teach my stuff without to much interference by what is possible or not.
/Robert Johansson
Hi,
I like your distinction that the athletes are ready to go into action without much epistemilogical needs or needs for understanding. I assume it’s because what they’ve practiced and learned.
I was curious about one of your statements: “The NLP so called propulsion system that bandler teach is old archeology and not needed as it is artificial in its construction” In contrast then your system goes to the inherent natural construction? I’d like to hear more about the contrast with what is in your system that is not an artificial construction.
Best,
T
Hello!
I´ve been folloeing your work for quite some time and i agree with it all.
I wonder if you have any experience on working with children? I would be delighted to read about your experiences in that case!
Thanks for your work!
E