In NLP the idea is to build a powerful motivation system called propulsion which is a push/pull system, one negative and one positive to drag and push you to do it.
That is to design a motivation system to make you do things no matter what.
Its the way Richard Bandler built motivation, by trying to build massive enhanced states of intense feelings to bear upon that notion people need massive propulsion to get anywhere, and that is true in space where the propulsion might need a good push.
Now, I get asked this, so what do you do then in RBIm that doesn’t do that?
One of the ideas here is when we need motivation, its due to causality, its due to a limitation inherent in the system or reality in the individual.
So a Bandler propulsion system is designed to deal with that inherent, weakness of the human desire and basically force the individual in spite of their beliefs.
So, this guy at the workshop asked to get motivation, now I looked at him, sure, so, what is it that you need motivation for?
Its like this, to be motivated, we need a reason.
I don’t understand why Bandler of all people would design a system that actually makes it harder to get motivated, not easier and doing so, with his co-creation of NLP one has to assume he is kinda smart doing things?
Why is NLP such enhance to overcome stuff?
Its like that human beings suddenly cant do shit unless they get into these highly charged states, and if you ever been to a Bandler workshop you know it, high energy states, big words, and channeled patterns of change behaviors.
That is what Bandler does, he see you as limited.
He runs patterns on you, to let you achieve freedom to break out of the personal jail you built.
He isn’t empowering you, he basically is doing the opposite.
So, what then, well as this guy asked about motivation, and the reasons for it, I told him I don’t do such work, I don’t work with the past.
I work with the future, so what is it like when your already achieved and done this, thing?
So, elicitation of the future experience, right, its done deal, now, as I did that, he went from highly worried and ridden with anxiety to a sitting, Buddha more or less from one day to the next.
Now, behaviors, are happening when reality changes, and it does so when we alter the experience to a future one where this thing, is already done, and as it is, then as it is done, you already have the behaviors, and there is no reason anymore to get motivated.
Its already happen, and now, its a cruise.
No need to build massive feelings to stay on track to stay focused, all one does is to keep track of the experience created, and let it happen.
That is the faith basically with a knowing how it works in advance.
Take something you don’t do and don’t want to do.
I don’t ask you to do it or anything, I ask you, do you wanna do it?
If you get one of those, and you say, yea I like to do it BUT I wont as I am not motivated to do it.
Its like smoking, people want to stop BUT they cant.
They cant bring about the proper motivations, ie reasons to stop.
So, I ask, ok here is the deal, let say you have already done it, the thing you want to do BUT don’t do.
BUT I don’t wanna do it?
Yes you do, your just lacking proper motivation to do it, right and if you had that you be doing it right?
Yea sure!
BUT you don’t, as you don’t have the proper reasons to actually do it, right?
Yea…
Now, reasons are the source to belief, we assume, to do something we don’t do, we need reasons to get our butt to do it, right?
Ok, so people try motivation systems, they do not work that well.
Bandlers propulsion system doesn’t work that well as it is a artificial system that people don’t use naturally as the brain isn’t wired for such designs.
Its due to the weakness and flaw of NLP and the designs of DHE and NHR later on, its inherently not so useful to run highly charged states to overcome and change.
So, I go, when you already have done this task, and I know, you don’t want to really do it, and you don’t need to do it, all I ask, is to get a future experience, when this task is done and done.
We don’t want you to change anything about you or anything else about this, all I do want is this chance to let you to have the experience you would have if you had done it.
Would that be fine with you?
Now, since RBIm works with the structure of how human brains actually changes, its so much easier and faster and the idea is that its no pain, no struggle no, anxiety, no complicated moves to make it work.
How can a kid go out and play a whole day, and never get bored?
He or she don’t lack motivation ever, its only after age 4 the kid you have starts to get bored and then they get reasons, to do it, aha!
A human pattern is now being taught inside the society, where kids are trained to respond to reasons.
By getting access to the pre-age 4 experience, having done it, then the motivations and reasons, stops to exist, they simply go away.
I done and talked to people about this, and they all suddenly, realize, when pointed out, they old reason idea is gone.
They suddenly don’t need to be motivated.
Its like real magic.
And its only magic, when you don’t know how its done.
This is why athletes, do things they do, due to them suddenly understand to get results, they if they do it like this, then they have all the motivation required without even needing a reason.
What I have had trouble with was to the way to explain this.
I spent 6 years to get to this point where I know when I teach things, I can get across the individual so they understands the somatic distinction in combination with cognitive attention/Intention, so they can set the marker and be back into the experience, within the context they so desire.
If its the Mythoself that is done to create a sense, no matter the context in many ways, across context doesn’t give that idea justice.
Doing that without needing to explain using words but using a somatic motion allows a much better getting the message across.
One thing I watched Joseph do, and as he did that, he didn’t use calibration, he used what he calls adumbration, and his own explanation of what he do, well basically sucks.
I didn’t understand that due to him being unable in spite of his so called precision in language explaining concept stuff that many people so admire.
I didn’t understand his answer either as he used so many metaphors doing that explanation I just knew, he doesn’t know what he talks about.
That from the guy with extreme precision in words?
Anyone else bought that bullshit?
That he actually is precise?
That is what happens when people use NLP to draw forth the assumptions about how reasons and beliefs works.
John Grinder did the same thing, he also explained his precise wordings and meaning exactly what this reference to as NLP allows a precise meaning to be stated and referenced accordingly, due to how people make comparisons, Grinder and Carmen assumed, they are precise in their words and reference and they also stated all we have is neurological and semantic transforms and we can never know actual reality?
COME ON!!!
Didn’t anyone else notice that pattern in the bullshit book “whispering in the wind” than me?
So how can we take anything what Grinder and Carmen says or write with any kind of precision when they basically invalidate themselves in the process doing so?
Think about that for a reason.
/Robert Johansson
Loading ...