Question:
Can you explain if you have one future experience now and continualy update or do
you have multiple future experiences and continually update.
Answer:
Your question is based upon causality, ie cause and effect.
I cant properly answer that due to how beliefs works within this kind of experience.
Let me give you an example, I eat the same food, each lunch, now most people will look at me and say, how come you eat the same food every day?
My answer would be, I don’t.
Now, obviously the individual asking, wont get it.
For them, the food is the same.
“It” the food, never changes.
That is how causality and generalizations works if one uses the basis of VAKOG as NLP or psychology, its how people learn to think and experience the world.
In the specific experience, there is only one experience, its the presence of now, within the movement of time being, now, this is, experience moving within the experience of what is going on now.
So then, there is only now, no actual future, as your associated or more properly stated, identified with the context your engaged into.
This is the moments, when the sense of time disappears.
Generalizations normally produces automated behavior without awareness and intention, here the same (ontology) allows you to be present and then the generalization even if the same, always changes in your experience, which allows it to be new each time due to the combination of somatic/cognitive functions according to the RBIm protocol.
This is what students in for example Royes camp experienced and why Connirae and Steve andreses never could figure out what Roye did as NLP cant go into this experience, it is outside the NLP field of knowledge.
This cant be done using NLP, its simply impossible.
That is why RBIm replaces NLP as RBIm further enhances human conditions to improve their experience of their life, without complicated and artificial maneuvers. There is no reason to do changework the NLP way anymore.
Now, the question is, how can it be new, every time and still be a generalization? Its due that your neurology is organized differently in a more pre 4 age with the after 4 age brain dominance.
(comparison with identification in context.)
Question:
For one specific outcome that let’s say it takes one day how would the process work?
Now if the outcome was going to take one year how would the process work?
Answer:
It works the same.
Elicit baseline blueprint experience using established protocols [RBIm] and then, access the wanted future experience, either it be a specific day or a year.
Learn the markers of position being in that experience, which allows the focus of attention to produce the intention.
So, your choosing what the experience is, moment to moment.
That is the belief you want to have with you that you actually can choose any experience, from moment to moment, like this. Its also only true to have such a belief when your know how its like using the RBIm to actually produce the experience like this.
Before, its not true and the belief lacks meaning, but when the experience is been had, then the belief makes sense, as it allows one to actually do.
Having the belief, obviously is better than to not have it, but the experience, allows you to access the structure that gives it power.
Then it makes sense, and adds meaning to the experience one has.
As I did the audio interview with Oliver, he asked me about the difference between the NOTNLP protocol and the RBIm, and as I later talked about this, I showed him the experience in difference, and it was WOW!
Let say you have a memory or experience from some special moment, where you was absorbed into whatever it was, it might been it looked perfect, or it was something else but it had a quality of interest that simply attracted you.
This type of quality allows a individual to experience, life from a position where everything is, for example perfect.
Now, I understand how to teach that experience to people using the RBIm protocols, in minutes.
I cant use NLP or hypnosis as they uses a different brain function to experience and understand the world.
Its not compatible to do that.
Now, one must ask, isn’t then NLP good also?
NLP allowed me to do this thing I do, as the method allowed me to create enough of understanding behind behavior, context, state and understand the differences in actual behavior.
Most people doing NLP simply changes how people feel about the problem.
The behavior still remains the same.
That is why clients sometimes cant believe they have changed as they think they feel the same, until they test it out and respond differently to the phobia.(this is why parts sucks)
I had one student who actually had to travel to the location where he got the height phobia as he couldn’t believe it worked.
It worked to fast, took me 10 seconds to do it.
Even though he couldn’t access his fear, or have it anymore imagined himself, he couldn’t believe it had worked as it went so fast.
I did a 5 minute intervention to a guy in Scotland after a NHR event, where people tried to help this guy for hours and hours, as I understood his basis of reality as it is kinda funny to cast spells.
But what I do and done over the years never been NLP as I fast did things that was based upon evolutionary changes, and since such tools never were found within NLP I had to find it elsewhere.
The experience in Denmark allowed me to run a comparison mode check, allowing me to start a testing ground which took me 5+ years to run completely but then again I got something that is even better than NLP.
I understand enough to produce the wanted experience for a individual based upon the spoken and unspoken traits of behavior. That doesn’t mean they understand though.
For me, the answer is a lot about having had the answer and experience it but didn’t recognize it due to, the lack of awareness of what it was due to a lack of comparison at the time.
Now, I got that, and a system of replicating the wanted experience.
RBIm.
/Robert Johansson
Loading ...