Reality today is much different than it was 50 years ago.
When we are in a technological era we get gadgets that makes things easier. Back in 1980 around 1200 people worked the mines in Kiruna, today its like 150 or less and shrinking and today the mine produce more ore than it did 1980.
Now, external events are easier to understand than internal in how our mind works.
One might ask me, so if I do this RBIm, then what would be the difference for me?
You be moving your experience and perception to a vestibular access meaning, you be having a body oriented experience of your life vs the causality based one your most likely currently is having.
The RBIm allows us to re-shape reality as what we have experienced, don’t mean we are trapped into what has been true for us.
This allow us to experience or perceive the external world differently, as the events no longer means the same for us.
Once I was a sport fanatic, I watched a lot of sports, today, I seldom even lift an eyebrow when sports are shown.
When we shift to a more body we shift our attention inwards which allow us to track in real time our own experience as we are having it, this is a shift in perceptual reality, which is what happens when we have our own experience.
This inward attention keeps or locks our position in how we set the sensory array the VAKOg and we can then wander around, within that internal experience, and then experience the world from that experience and obviously, this is different than most people ever had.
How is it like winning a Olympic medal, how is it like working with someone and they suddenly release decades of stress?
Its like saying, you had to be there.
Using time lines as NLP does only shifts peoples VAKOg events, and if done properly, the position might shift along the way but it is a complicated and also, basically still set the VAKOg or causality as the major way to experience reality, and basically it also often extends that making it worse.
Now, I know its kinda cool to explore stuff that happens in our minds, to adjust something, so a shift happens, and most never realize we are always shifting our experience, however, most keep going believing they always have the same experience when they are not.
Then, to say as I do, but isn’t that the same as you teach then?
No, what I teach allows you to differentiate when the one or the other is running.
Either your running your experience, or the experience is running you.
That is where Intention comes handy, we can by focus our awareness, shift our span of attention towards something else, and this allows us to re-direct our own experience in real time.
Its like having one set of experience, and suddenly, just shift focus, and go into this other experience, just by being attentive.
Its not about changing one experience, add resources to it, and smack it hard and integrate it, no, here we just simply shift our attention point, towards a future experience, allowing our body to perform its duty.
I ask people doing sports, how is it like doing this thing, and already done it?
They go, what?
I say,w ell you when your doing this does it like that and how is it like having already done that for you?
When they have that, in experience, and keep the same position inwards attentive, running this they are able to experience the nirvana of sports.
The ultimate experience, enjoying the thing you do and doing it in flow, perfect or in the way you like it.
Its like going into the higher levels of mind, the same one people want to experience what they do and still be doing it.
This is the level of performance the very best athletes get when they are doing the zone.
However, this also means they are loosing themselves in the process as who we are isn’t there then.
Jan-Ove Waldner was in his last Olympic start, doing and playing a game that was extraordinary at his age, and he won and as he did that, he woke up and this can be seen on camera after the match-ball is done, he stated after, he didn’t know where he was, and also who he was playing like that. In the next game, he couldn’t repeat that level of performance and lost.
Now, when we fully identify with the context, we also tend to loose the concept of self as this isn’t hold as it once was, its a new set of context guiding us, the ball, the external contextual parameters, and this is the same as the demonic states John Grinder and De Lozier investigated where the performance we do, we transcend our experience to be, one with the performance.
Now, many never learn to do this, as NLP is somewhat not able to teach people to do so safely.
The idea of our self, being something tied to our soul or body or somewhat else often limit our performance, as there is no such as all we are is tied to what we attach to it.
I tell people I coach, if you want it, you can be the nr1 in the world in your sport.
Requires hard work, and dedication but its there in their experience if they so choose.
When we are able to enter such experience where we suddenly are able to transcend our experience of what we are or who we are, suddenly people understand.
What most wants to do is to keep the one self they once did learn to be, and then to believe its like this due to my previous experience, this is, who I am now.
So, I get this girl coming to see me, after 2 years of therapy she is basically a mess.
So I ask her, who she was, and as she searched fort he answer which took around 12 hours for her.
Until then, I waited until she could give me an answer, and she was scarred, unhappy, badly self confidence no trust in herself basically she wasn’t worth anything.
Now, as soon she could give me an answer, all her problems went away.
Much to her and her boyfriends surprise.
Suddenly she wasn’t bound and tied to her past experience, she was free.
As I did in the November workshop, so what is your best day like I asked?
Obvious, the first response was, like this and I asked, is it based upon what has been your best day or a day that might come from the future being an even better day?
Naturally it was noted, it was a causality based upon past to present reference.
So I said, what if you just had a future only reference of your best day ever?
Now, as she did that, suddenly she understood the difference, between past experience and defining life from the past to the future instead of using the future to present.
I then elicited her own way to know its like this, and she could then keep this position and as she accessed her experience, it was all new every time.
The same but new.
You wish your sex life was like that everyday right?
Now, she went from a NLP, VAKOG or representation way to understand her world, to a internal inward vestibular experience, and this shifted everything she once believed to be true about stuff.
Its hard to understand this without the proper experience, as this is the level when people get how the phrase let go fits in, its like this idea people can just let go of a past memory or past experience, they cant.
It doesn’t compute for them as they are told to let it go.
Now, as she had this kind of experience, and note it works, she now has control over how she will react to external events, based either upon her own internal experience or not.
Then, she can choose and decide, is this the experience I want to have, and if not, shift, just like that.
Its the shift of our decision point, now in NLP its called the T.O.T.E and there is a added idea where the way people use information and then creates a decision point.
Now, normally people use a past reference (memory) to decide what the future the upcoming task will be like and evaluated against the past reference.
This is what people do that are afraid, they take the task they are going to do, and then based upon past often a bad experience, they link this to a task they never have done, and then feel bad about it in advance, even before they done it….
When I am about to do something I always think its easy either I done it before or going to do a new thing.
Now, this create a experience, about an experience we haven’t done yet and people often ask me, I cant do that future experience thingy as I am never sure about the future.
I haven’t ever done that before.
I go, you do it now.
To ask the question, I cant do it, imply they have done it, in their mind and then decided, they cant do it.
Ah, note I can use NLP really well if needed to explain the causality of human beings.
So, I teach people to do one thing differently, time travel to a future experience and decide in advance how good it will be and then set that as the new reference point, before doing a task.
Now, doing that, using VAKOG as they do in NLP doesn’t work.
You need to use a embodied approach as RBIm does it.
Then it will be easier and also safer.
You be aware of the difference, as I did the workshop, I commented, and asked people about their experience they had, and they didn’t need to leave it, and let it go, they could still do it even when talking about it.
That is due to when one knows how one holds or keeps the position then its like this.
One could say its ones own internal anchor, however, its more than that, as it is working even when one would be depressed where the NLP anchoring would fail, this then would work.
Little is known about the vestibular system, its one of the system that holds balance but also have other functions not known at current time.
We learn to orient us after how we perceive the world trough our five senses, we create time and the track of time trough those, creating a sense of start and ending.
When one does that, we also to a degree robs ourselves of some other particular interesting experiences, where one can stay within one, being one, with the environment or context.
This kind of experience, is not supported in the society most live in today, its do this now or rather yesterday.
Then learning to support the post 4 years of age where this becomes the dominant way we experience our surroundings, its also creates the ex-tense of habit to believe and think the world is, causality based.
When one have this kind of experience, one absolutely know the difference, and what many cant understand, if its so great why don’t people always stay in it?
Some do.
I have done change-work for 15+ years and done trainings for 10+ and for me, the same experience is always there when I work.
In that context, it never changes, its just great.
Now, obviously we can do that but also, what kind of experience would we like to be running constantly if we had a choice?
Timelines in all respect, but removing people from the experience seems a troublesome way to make people more dead than alive if u ask me.
One benefit of running such experiences from a future point reference, are that we can judge the action we are about to do based upon previous failed experience, and if we use sports as an example, maybe you make a huge mistake, and then you just don’t dwell on it, you just shift gear into keeping track of your future one, and the mistake basically never happen and cant influence your next action.
Now, if you believe the future isn’t real I got news for you, the future is as real as your current past, as your past basically is just a remembered event, that differs from the future on one single variable, that you actually did the things you did remember. However, many scientific research points that our memory is filled with gaps, and we constantly are updating those based upon associations, so what we remember, are changing even when we believe its always the same.
Now, as we are seldom aware of that as our current consciousness and awareness as it is, how can it be different?
It cant.
As it is, it is.
Then the comparison mode kicks in and we suddenly become aware of the context we are within.
This allow us to either shift experience to a better one or enter a worse one.
I have talked to sports people, and told them, when they try to explain to me what the problem is, and I say, well lets assume for a moment the following, I want you to demonstrate for me this perfect move in their sport.
Now, obviously they will try tell me, they cant do that, obviously as they have a problem.
So, I continue, well I understand that but do what I ask you first then we talk.
So, in a moment, they go like they can just do, what they just couldn’t do, just like that.
They look at me as I did some magic.
I go, what?
This is impossible!
It is? I say.
Yes, this isn’t possible!
So, I witness something that is both impossible and possible?
Yes!
Aha.
People have beliefs and assumptions about what is doable based upon previous past reference and since everyone is telling them it cant be done, then it cant be done. I just use a future reference where it is done, and then its doable, obviously…
That is why I love what Oliver did, talking to a lady who shots 100 in golf is like a real amateur, then to go to 80 shots after a 15 minute talk is like, impossible for the pga golf trainers, its not doable for them. You just cant drop 20 shots like that, its not possible.
Its like the Hank Haney Project with the basketball guy, who couldn’t swing, he failed with him to improve his swing playing the game, and its due to them lacking tools of how the mind and body functions doing athletic performance.
Now, as soon we use the future experience, that haven’t happen yet, but as we access it, set the criteria what the quality of our experience should be like for us, say, perfect or flow, or in the zone, as we then establish that, we have that experience, untainted and new and fresh every time like this as we taught ourselves this is the experience I want to have to perceive this thing I do.
Growing up, people around you teach you how to be and your formed from that a lot, now, there is a opportunity to cast those shackles loose, to uncover what is doable, possible and impossible and having fun doing it.
You set new contextual variables, attach new set of experience to the context, and then you can create basically just about any experience, and then, find out what its like having such experiences.
Come timetravel with me.
/Robert Johansson
Hi,
Thanks for the reminder of the FUTURE ONLY REFERENCE. What a powerful orientation. Never having mistakes in memory or representational memory sounds awesome. Always having the choice to have an even all-out better experience than you yet have had and already had in the future.
I wanted to ask you about the reference to chainging the perceptual reality. Is this the subjective or inter-subjective reality as Joseph would say?
In an average hour how many times to you apply your method to a future only reference point back into your vestibular/somatic/intention/attention position? In an average day how many times?
Thanks for the Future Now,
T
Hum, there is two ways we can define reality, either we have a fully internal reference or using a Internal from a external one.
This create a contextual reality based one.
So, if one have a internal one, this allows maximum freedom in ones behavioural output.
It also might cause you to be drag to court, hanged, shot, fucked over and so on due to your flexibility in behaviour is now, well consider out of the normal range.
The other route is also true, you might get success and rewards due to a more flexible behavioural output.
The thing I point to here is, reality is based upon our own reference which is contextual based, and this in turn influence how we percive life.
If we are identifying or associated into the context, this allows us to be, which is the whole form, but from what reference?
Since the signals in society will be behavioural, we can by a good deal of accuracy tell if the approach we use are working or not based upon the behavioural responses you get doing it.
If the responses are in context or outside context, those are our only options, we can pretty fast determine if what we do, works or not.
If one has a boss, that always nag them and complain about them, and the next day, that they simply stop doing that anymore, we can assume the change
“the behaviour” in the boss, are now changed due to the internal reality has changed behaviorally in the worker.
The boss now starts to complain about another worker instead.
The signals (behaviour) is now different in the same context.
/Rob